Well, that's certainly true enough, although without any actual personal knowledge of the situation, I choose to give KenM the benefit of the doubt. Whereas I don't know the woman in question even so well as to have a name for her or share a messageboard with her, so I can feel free to assume that Ken is correct about her.fusangite said:I too would like to object to the insinuation on the part of other posters that I somehow favour impaired driving or feel this woman conducted herself well. It is actually possible for both parties to be in the wrong here.
Mallus said:1) Drinking isn't illegal. Operating a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol level in excess of the legal limit is.
2) You're free to feel that drinking is morally wrong. Many people feel otherwise.
3) For the record, I don't believe the womans actions were right. I do, however, believe that KenM's actions were low and cowardly. Both can be true. And I suspect he believes that too (or else why start this thread? He could just as easily posted a thread called "I had to do a very difficult thing").
Torm said:Well, that's certainly true enough, although without any actual personal knowledge of the situation, I choose to give KenM the benefit of the doubt. Whereas I don't know to woman in question even so well as to have a name for her or share a messageboard with her, so I can feel free to assume that Ken is correct about her.![]()
While you were one of the earlier posters on that side of the fence, so to speak, I really think the posters that K'Trava, The Universe, Ampolitor, myself and others are surprised at are the later ones who ARE defending her behavior and/or driving while imbibing.![]()
Ampolitor said:PEople need to learn their facts before they make statements, it is ILLEGAL to take ANYTHING that impairs your senses while driving
See, this is my point - Ken is one of us. We don't know this woman at all. So let's back our guy against imaginary (to us) people.Darth K'Trava said:True. We're only getting one side of the story here.
I can get behind that! (and by extension, KenM)Torm said:See, this is my point - Ken is one of us. We don't know this woman at all. So let's back our guy against imaginary (to us) people.![]()
Funny statement. Who is working against anyone here? The question we are talking about was "Did I do the right thing?". Our answers serve no other purpose than giving Ken guidelines to think the whole situation over once again. No more and no less. It's his life, it was his decision to talk about it, and it's his own decision what he wants to draw from this discussion. As simple as thatTorm said:See, this is my point - Ken is one of us. We don't know this woman at all. So let's back our guy against imaginary (to us) people.![]()
Torm said:See, this is my point - Ken is one of us. We don't know this woman at all. So let's back our guy against imaginary (to us) people.![]()