Does Remove Paralysis Affect Stunned Targets?

Atavar

First Post
If a creature suffering from the stunned condition receives a remove paralysis spell is he then able to perform actions again?

Thanks,

Atavar
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad

"Paralyzed
A paralyzed character is frozen in place and unable to move or act. A paralyzed character has effective Dexterity and Strength scores of 0 and is helpless, but can take purely mental actions. A winged creature flying in the air at the time that it becomes paralyzed cannot flap its wings and falls. A paralyzed swimmer can’t swim and may drown. A creature can move through a space occupied by a paralyzed creature—ally or not. Each square occupied by a paralyzed creature, however, counts as 2 squares.

Stunned
A stunned creature drops everything held, can’t take actions, takes a -2 penalty to AC, and loses his Dexterity bonus to AC (if any). " - taken from the SRD.

It looks to me like they are two different conditions. So I would say, no.
 

That was my reasoning as well. However, consider the following:

Remove Paralysis said:
"You can free one or more creatures from the effects of any temporary paralysis or related magic, including a ghoul’s touch or a slow spell."

A person under the effects of a slow spell is not paralyzed, yet he would benefit from a remove paralysis spell. Plus, the above statement is not necessarily exhaustive, so one could argue (as my players did) that remove paralysis would work for someone suffering from a power word stun effect.

Thoughts?

Atavar
 

While the list is not exhausted, because there are other ways to paralyze someone, the inclusion of slow is specifically called out. If there were other non-paralysis exceptions, I believe they would be called out as well.

"Paralyzed" is a very different condition than "stunned." No, remove paralysis would not remove the stunned condition.
 

There's also this: stun is more of a mental condition, while all the others listed affect you more physically. (You can take mental actions while paralyzed, but not while stunned.) That's somewhat flavor based, but it might make a good rule of thumb about what remove paralysis can effect.
 

Mouseferatu said:
"Paralyzed" is a very different condition than "stunned." No, remove paralysis would not remove the stunned condition.

If I were to allow remove paralysis to have any effect it would not be to remove the stunned condition but rather the "can take no actions" portion of the stunned condition. The stunned character would still have dropped everything and have the penalties to AC and Dex. Also, the stunned effect would have to be a magical effect (as it is with power word stun) in order for remove paralysis to work.

Along the same vein as remove paralysis, what about freedom of movement? Would that work?

Freedom of Movement said:
"This spell enables you or a creature you touch to move and attack normally for the duration of the spell, even under the influence of magic that usually impedes movement, such as paralysis, solid fog, slow, and web."

Does power word stun impede movement? Or does it simply apply a condition (stunned) that indirectly impedes movement?

Thanks,

Atavar
 

This is another of those areas where the ambiguity really doesn't help.

The spell seems mostly to affect magical restrictions of your mobility. Paralysis, ghoul touch, and slow are mentioned. But would it work against, say a Web or Entangle spell? What about a Hold Monster? Held and paralyzed are different effects, mostly in that one's mental and the other physical... but if Remove Paralysis can alieviate a mental paralysis like Hold, why not a mental paralysis like being konked silly by a PW:Stun?
 

Remove ads

Top