Cautiously hopeful. Robin Hood stuff is a really mixed bag (though I'm not a Prince of Thieves hater--Alan Rickman makes up for a multitude of sins).
(IMO the only thing bad about Prince of Thieves is Kevin Costner's American accent.)
There was little wrong with Prince of Thieves, it just wasn't especially right. Costner (who, yes, is American and sounds it), rather than the passion he brought to The
Untouchables through
JFK, started (or continued, depending on how you view
Dances With Wolves) his streak of underacting performances that lasted through
The Postman. Morgan Freeman brought wonderful acting to a tropish role. Sean Connery came for a requisite cameo that was very much cameo-shaped and of cameo-duration.
Rickman and Geraldine McEwan absolutely nailed the villain roles and elevated every scene in which they appeared. The problem is that if all the great components of a movie are in one facet (villains, visuals, score), you don't say that they elevate the whole, you instead say it's wonderful villains/visuals/score in an otherwise bad/bland movie. It's like Raul Julia in
Street Fighter (perhaps moreso, since unlike
Street Fighter, Robin Hood Prince of Thieves isn't otherwise bad so much as muddled and bland).
Maid Marian wasn't originally part of the Robin Hood stories. She comes from the tradition of French pastoral poetry about the shepherd Robin and the country lass Marian. When those works crossed over to England, "Robin" became confused with Robin from the Robin Hood legends, and so Robin Hood acquired a love interest in Marian.
Another interesting (well, I think so at least) factoid: Will Scarlet was, in some older stories, Will Skylark.
Thank you for not starting a 'What do most people get wrong about Robin Hood' thread.