AFGNCAAP said:Here's one used for a two-handed Claymore.
baradtgnome said:Looks very nice. 2 questions
Isn't 2 handed Claymore redundant? I thought that Claymores were consistantly long enough to require 2 hands to use.
baradtgnome said:Isn't that weapon pictured, although in Claymore style, too short to be a historically accurate Claymore? I thought they were all plus or minus six feet.
I'm no expert, so don't take this as gospel.