RigaMortus
Explorer
I know this post is from page 1, but I just had to respond to it...
I think your DM handled it a bit wrong IMO (not entirely wrong thoug). You see, initiative is just a way to break down the free-form system of roleplaying so that everyone gets a turn. Pretty much, anyone can do anything at any time. But when an "opposing force" (friend or foe) wants to react to you, you need to take turns, thus rolling init.
In your case, the Fighter probably intended to fight. So he drew his weapon. Note that he did not have to roll init prior to drawing his weapon. It wasn't until an "opposing force" (the guards) wanted to react to this, that init was rolled. So again, Fighter draws weapon, guards see this and wish to react, so init is rolled. The guards roll higher and get to react. This is where your DM went wrong (IMO). The guards did not know your intentions really. I think it would have been more plausable for the guards to either Ready until you did something or Delay. Now, if drawing your weapon is a crime, or you made your intentions well known, then I can see where the guards were justified in pulling their weapons and attacking you.
The way I would have worded it if I were your DM is, "The guards attacked first because they saw you draw your weapons" Plain and simple. You clearly did not "attack" them first, although it could be argued you initiated combat. But still, the reason the guards attacked was because they saw you drawing your weapons and were able to react quicker than you did.
Quinnman said:We had a weird scenario come up in my group a while back...
On our way to a city, we met some soldiers. Due to differing oppinions (too lengthy to describe here) our fighter drew his sword and this resulted in the soldiers attacking us... this is all pretty normal, but here comes the funny part...
The soldiers won initiative, thus catching our fighter (and the rest of us) flatfooted, but our DM *specifically* told us that they attacked us because "we attacked first"...!... so... we attack first, but are >still< caught off guard!?!?
This is true according to the rules, but it makes >no< sense! Needless to say, we were not happy about that ruling
EDIT: sorry if I got a bit off track here...![]()
I think your DM handled it a bit wrong IMO (not entirely wrong thoug). You see, initiative is just a way to break down the free-form system of roleplaying so that everyone gets a turn. Pretty much, anyone can do anything at any time. But when an "opposing force" (friend or foe) wants to react to you, you need to take turns, thus rolling init.
In your case, the Fighter probably intended to fight. So he drew his weapon. Note that he did not have to roll init prior to drawing his weapon. It wasn't until an "opposing force" (the guards) wanted to react to this, that init was rolled. So again, Fighter draws weapon, guards see this and wish to react, so init is rolled. The guards roll higher and get to react. This is where your DM went wrong (IMO). The guards did not know your intentions really. I think it would have been more plausable for the guards to either Ready until you did something or Delay. Now, if drawing your weapon is a crime, or you made your intentions well known, then I can see where the guards were justified in pulling their weapons and attacking you.
The way I would have worded it if I were your DM is, "The guards attacked first because they saw you draw your weapons" Plain and simple. You clearly did not "attack" them first, although it could be argued you initiated combat. But still, the reason the guards attacked was because they saw you drawing your weapons and were able to react quicker than you did.