Cthulhudrew said:Polyhedron 159 came out in 2003; did the term "gish" ever appear anywhere before that? Just curious as to how far back the term goes.
Psion said:You mean in generic usage, or pretaining to Gith fighter/magic-users? The latter, which has been referred to several times in this thread, originated in the 1e Fiend Folio.
1st ed.Cthulhudrew said:Polyhedron 159 came out in 2003; did the term "gish" ever appear anywhere before that? Just curious as to how far back the term goes.
Rather important name at that. There wern't any Githyanki before there was Gith.Gith was a proper name, IIRC. Now, like many/most proper names it probably has some literal meaning/association with a word or phrase.
I know!Whizbang Dustyboots said:Ha, that's awesome!
Thanee said:It's both stupid and wrong (unless the character in question is a githyanki, that is).
Bye
Thanee
Duskblade suggests shadows and the ability to use swords. And it turns out the class is ... a sword-using illusionist.3d6 said:Gish (or zerth) would have been a much better name than "duskblade" for a melee combatant spellcaster. Neither name makes it obvious what your character actually does, but at least gish has a long history in D&D. It also avoids the silly trend in D&D towards classes whose names are just two words jammed together (duskblade, warblade, swordsage, spellsword, battlemage, soulknife, etc).