D&D (2024) Is anyone going to use the new 2024 backgrounds?


log in or register to remove this ad

But it is. If you are in a game that only uses the 2024 backgrounds then Scholar can't be your background.
no it isn’t, you are missing the point. So what if there is no scholar, the point was that it is self-explanatory why the background offers a bonus to INT rather than STR whereas you pretended that it is just a random selection of three attributes for no good reason

Because I have strength from climbing rigging that did not exist on the boats I sailed on? That makes no sense.
what makes no sense is you saying you gained STR from climbing rigging that does not exist, so you got it from rowing your longboat instead, big deal. Different boat type, different reason, both plausible.

Would you rather they said it definitely is from climbing the rigging right in the background, leaving you stranded for your longboat?

The point is there is a good reason why you gain a bonus to that attribute, you just try to find some rare exception for a gotcha. I already told you that if your boat is so different from a medieval boat that sailor makes no sense for it, then choose a different background, or make one up. For 99% of boats it works just fine
 



why insist on sailor if your goal is the highest possible int? A sailor buffing pretty much any other attribute makes more sense, so it should not buff int, doing so would be nonsense
As a trained navigator, a sailor could get a boost to Int. That would make sense. In terms of feats a sailor could readily have lucky, toughness or skilled. I could have a sailor with a touch of elven blood starting with the magic initiative feat.

There's so many ways to create backgrounds, which is why customizing should be encouraged.
 

Putting the ASIs into the backgrounds is very similar to putting the ASIs in the races, and there is a reason we went away from that.
True. Before Tasha's Cauldron of Everything, races had fixed ASIs that tended to favor only certain classes. A Dragonborn character started the game with a +2 STR and a +1 CHA. This arrangement favored STR-based Fighters, Barbarians, Bards, Sorcerers and Warlocks. It also really favored Paladins who depended on both STR and CHA. But if you wanted to be Dragonborn who wanted to be a Rogue or a Wizard, you were kind of out of luck until you could grab an ASI at 4th level for DEX or INT.

Tasha's Cauldron of Everything gave everyone the chance to assign the +2/+1 or the +1/+1/+1 ASIs to any ability score they wanted their character to have. Which IMO was an improvement. As ASIs were now another element to customize your character with.

And now 2024 D&D has decided to follow in the footsteps of PF2 and Level Up by putting ASIs into Backgrounds instead of the races. However, certain backgrounds do favor certain character classes. Anyone who has followed the Quick Build rules in 5e when designing their characters knows this. You want your character to be a Fighter, the class's Quick Build suggests that you take up the Soldier background. However, you don't have to take up this background for your Fighter if you don't want to. There probably are a number of players who take up the suggested background simply because it saves them the time and effort. But there probably are a number of other players who take up another background just to put in an unexpected twist to their character's backstory. ;) The street urchin who became the fighter, or the acolyte who became a fighter, etc. Neither approach is wrong when developing a backstory IMO.

PF2 has it where you receive a fixed ASI of +2 from one of two ability scores (such as INT or WIS) and a floating ASI of +2 that you can assign to another ability score of your choice. This is an addition to your ancestral ASIs, your class ASI, and 4 floating ASIs at 1st level. Level Up otoh has it where you received a fixed ASI of +1 for just a single ability score and a floating ASI +1 that you can assign to another ability score of your choice. So, there is some choice here on where you want the ASIs to go when developing your character, just not a lot.

The background ASIs for 2024 D&D depend on whether or not you pick the +2/+1 option or the +1/+1/+1 option. But you can only apply these ASIs to three fixed ability scores, and these scores might favor particular classes much like how the fixed racial ASIs in the original 5e PHB did.

Since 2024 D&D is backwards compatible with 2014 D&D, it should be interesting to see which version of 5e's backgrounds will be picked up by the players. I'll be continuing with the backgrounds from 2014 D&D because there are no plans for my group to make the switch to 2024 D&D any time soon.
 
Last edited:


As a trained navigator, a sailor could get a boost to Int.
sounds more like a captain than a sailor

I already said that finding a reason for why it could be INT is no reason for the sailor background to boost it, that would only be a good reason if it would be widely accepted that boosting INT would be more representative of a sailor than the stats it currently boosts.
Pretty sure I can find an explanation for any stat if I tried, but there being an exception to the rule does not mean the rule does not represent the vast majority of cases

There's so many ways to create backgrounds, which is why customizing should be encouraged.
pretty sure I repeatedly said to create a custom one if none fit ;)
 
Last edited:

As a trained navigator, a sailor could get a boost to Int. That would make sense. In terms of feats a sailor could readily have lucky, toughness or skilled. I could have a sailor with a touch of elven blood starting with the magic initiative feat.

There's so many ways to create backgrounds, which is why customizing should be encouraged.
I think that you just described a cartographer or some kind of guide who happens to play their trade on a ship not a sailor.those two would probably fall under some kind of professional sage artisan or possibly featuralist type thing if you wanted to highlight it being self taught wisdom instead.

It's sounding very much like this is less about supporting a story than it is about minimizing the opportunity costs of naked CharOp & shielding it under an obfuscation of stormwind
 

I think that you just described a cartographer or some kind of guide who happens to play their trade on a ship not a sailor.those two would probably fall under some kind of professional sage artisan or possibly featuralist type thing if you wanted to highlight it being self taught wisdom instead.

It's sounding very much like this is less about supporting a story than it is about minimizing the opportunity costs of naked CharOp & shielding it under an obfuscation of stormwind
Anyone on a ship is "Sailor". That includes the "navigator" and the "captain", and there may be other specialists on board.

Choosing the abilities (while customizing proficiencies and feat) helps articulate what kind of "Sailor".
 

Remove ads

Top