Obviously, people have different perspectives on this. For example, I don't sign on to your interpretation of the Twitter exchange at all. To me, it look an awful lot like Price is holding forth on a topic, normal enough on the internet, on a discussion-based medium. Deroir, being interested in the topic and a fan of Price's, chimes in to discuss. That doesn't smack of mansplaining to me. That looks to me more like wanting to discuss a favorite topic but having a somewhat divergent take.I have read the Twitter exchange, and that is exactly what happened. The man did not disagree with her, she complained about her work and a man gave her unsolicited advice, incredibly basic at that, as if she didn't have a clue how to do any part of her job at all. That is manspalining, and Price was completely justified in complaining about it.
I did see the a post about the arena wars, but I didn't realize you had posted it or talked about it. I don't really care either, I was just pointing out that it could be honestly missed that you had posted such information.The guild wars thing was already posted, so I didn't need to repost it again. In that example, she called someone paid to pay GW games a sexist for simply disagreeing with her. That's why she was fired from there. I don't think Gradine has followed that link and read the twitter exchanges that prompted that scenario, because their responses to me aren't accurate as to what happened, as was also pointed out to them a few posts above by another user.
I agree.I don't think it's unreasonable to say you want collaborative sources before you automatically believe them.
That's how misinformation spreads, and once it's out, it's hard to close the barn door.
How do you tell the difference between mansplaining and disagreeing?Okay, it looks like we need a Mansplaining 101 lesson.
At the basic level, mansplaining is when a man corrects a woman or otherwise attempts to talk to her or teach her about something she already knows. The implication is that the woman must not know this thing and you, the very intelligent man, must teach her the correct thing.
Fast moving thread + contentious and emotional topic = easy to miss things. I'm just as guilty. Especially since my internet went down for the past couple hours and was reading/responding on my phone. I could have used better judgement, and I apologize for my contribution. FWIW, I actually have a lot of respect for everyone who has posted so far.I did see the a post about the arena wars, but I didn't realize you had posted it or talked about it. I don't really care either, I was just pointing out that it could be honestly missed that you had posted such information.
Now, I hardly think two accusations make much of a track record, but I pretty much always want corroborating evidence myself (regardless of the poster or the number of posts). It is to easy to mistaken about a great many things.
I agree.
One involves underestimating the intelligence and knowledge of the woman they're responding to, and the other involves engaging as intellectual equals.How do you tell the difference between mansplaining and disagreeing?
I see your point in a lot of your arguments, but I think this is taking it too far. @Sacrosanct has an opinion that they formed based on their interpretation of the evidence. You have a different opinion on the evidence. It is not uncommon for people to disagree what evidence is telling us. That is not a personal stake in defaming Price, IMO.I mean, you obviously have a personal stake in defaming Jessica Price specifically at all costs, and while I can speculate as to why, that's not helpful to anybody.
Why do you think Deroir's comment was the former and not the latter?One involves underestimating the intelligence and knowledge of the woman they're responding to, and the other involves engaging as intellectual equals.
No worries, I think you have been respectful and thoughtful in your discussion.Fast moving thread + contentious and emotional topic = easy to miss things. I'm just as guilty. Especially since my internet went down for the past couple hours and was reading/responding on my phone.
I feel I my have to the same if I keep responding! It is so easy to get turnaround in these discussions. I should drop out before I get to that point (if I haven't already).I could have used better judgement, and I apologize for my contribution.
You're right, of course, and I do owe @Sacrosanct an apology. As a woman with grandiose designs of one day maybe getting to work in gaming, Price has always been someone I have looked up to, as someone who was never afraid to stand up for herself and stick by her principles. It felt incredibly unfair to see her singled out in the way she was in this thread, and I still vigorously disagree with the characterization being put forward.I see your point in a lot of your arguments, but I think this is taking it too far. @Sacrosanct has an opinion that they formed based on their interpretation of the evidence. You have a different opinion on the evidence. It is not uncommon for people to disagree what evidence is telling us. That is not a personal stake in defaming Price.
The assumption of being an intellectual equal within the field, first and foremost.One involves underestimating the intelligence and knowledge of the woman they're responding to, and the other involves engaging as intellectual equals
Why do you think Deroir's comment was the former and not the latter?
One of the reasons I pulled out of the conversation is because I saw it going somewhere that may have caused damage in relationships. I understand better why you commented like you did with this post. And even if we disagree, I want to make it clear that I do respect you, and have learned a lot (especially over the past 2 years) from you in how to question some of my own preconceived notions. So regardless of how this thread turned out, I actually have listened to a lot of what you've been saying over the years and tried to better take into account your experiences to be more open minded myself.You're right, of course, and I do owe @Sacrosanct an apology. As a woman with grandiose designs of one day maybe getting to work in gaming, Price has always been someone I have looked up to, as someone who was never afraid to stand up for herself and stick by her principles. It felt incredibly unfair to see her singled out in the way she was in this thread, and I still vigorously disagree with the characterization being put forward.
I will say that as a trans woman (and especially one that transitioned relatively later, in my early 30's) I have a unique perspective on being mansplaining because I've been on both ends of it. When I thought I was a man I used to pull this crap all the time, and I always genuinely thought I was being helpful and a great ally. Then when people start doing the same thing to you and you start to realize the pattern and how bad it makes you feel... it just sucks, and I don't think anyone who has had to put up with it should have to put up with the amount of abuse and defamation that she's received.
I had to stop myself multiple times to ask if Paizo finally had made it in the green list.Maybe they'll make the green list now....(if you don't know, don't ask lol).
Prejudice can often be implicit or otherwise difficult to discern. It is not always, or often, someone hurling slurs or physical harassment or violence. In a corporate context, it could be not being promoted, one's ideas not being taken seriously, getting talked over in meetings, etc. A company isn't going to say to someone that they are not being promoted or are being fired because they are a minority, that would be crazy. And someone "mansplaining" might not be aware that they are doing it, that is, might not be aware that the way that they disagree with a women is *different than the way they would disagree with a man. Or, you can see the way Orion Black was marginalized from decision making at wotc, and they were not even really alleging malicious intent.How do you tell the difference between mansplaining and disagreeing?