Firebeetle
Explorer
As some of you know, I work part-time as a projectionist. As part of my duties, I often have to watch movies we have put together to insure there are no bad splices or other problems. Tonight, I once again sacrificed my time to watch Chronicles of Narnia.
First of all, go see this movie. It's smarter and better done than 95% of what's out there and a welcome respite from some very bad movie seasons. It is simply a well made film, with excellent acting, production values, excellent special effects (that never "show-off" or detract from the plot!), and a very satisfying, well-paced, character-driven story. Worth every bit of your money. Go see it, you won't be sorry.
Some thoughts:
A.) It's not "just a kid movie". Even though the animals talk. Children will love it, mind you, but adults can buy tickets without a prerequisite niece, nephew, son, daughter, street urchin, or other minor accompanying them. This is an intelligent movie that is done very well. All children's movies should treat their audience in such a manner.
B.) It's very true to the original, I could follow the text in my head and match it to the screen. Conversely, there are numerous additions, expansions, and some omissions to the text. For the purists among us, rejoice. You will have plenty of material to gripe and kvetch about for weeks on these and other boards. There will be plenty of opportunity for you to show how smart you are in your maticulous knowledge of C.S. Lewis. Don't pretend you don't like it.
Most changes seem to be of the cinemagraphic kind, the make the movie flow well or increase drama. Lewis' text is very realistic, with events happening over time. These gaps are usually eliminated for the movie. Other events are rearranged or added to give more drama and emotional tension. The beaver's house is fled while the wolves attack, there is an icy river action scene, etc. These scenes seem fine for what they are.
There are many little omissions. There is no stone knife, no scene of the witch hiding as a boulder, Rumblebuffin in not introduced properly nor does he knock down the gates, Aslan doesn't play with the girls, and I do miss the scene of the animals celebrating Christmas. Which brings me to my next point.
C.) I feel the Christian allegory of the movie has been minimized. There is not much you can do in this regard (Aslan's death is so central to the text) but what can be has been. There is no mention that I heard of the Emperor-beyond-the-sea (Narniaspeak for God) of that Aslan is his son or the witch his former executioner. Father Christmas is still in there (no, he doesn't look like a Coca-cola ad Santa) but his impact in minimized with the deletion of the animals celebrating Christmas scene. The director doesn't seem too keen on the whole Christian allegory thing from interviews. I think that's a mistake. This book, more than any other text, made me under salvation. "Edward, Aslan, Witch, got it," is what happened when I read it. It's not obvious to the casual observer, just very well written allegory. Honestly, Gandalf's resurrection is more obvious biblical allegory (although Tolkien swears it isn't, what do authors know?) than Narnia is.
D.) The kids are really kids, not pretend grown-ups. For so long movies have "today's kids" who talk like sarcastic, wise-cracking,immature adults. I hate that, as a teacher kids simply are not that way. These kids are really kids, and well-acted at that. It's so refreshing to have children that are truly believeable as children. Sadly, we are guarenteed posts to the oppostie, by posters whose vision of kids have been shaped by years of Hollywood convincing us that kids really are little smart-mouth adults.
There is also, refreshingly, no hint of sexuality in the movie. The white witch is fierce and beautiful, but not sexualized. This will jar some viewers I'm sure, but I found it quite refreshing for a change. (Hypocrite alert: I'm also the same guy who really liked Charlize Theron in Aeon Flux and Catherine Zeta-Jones in Legend of Zorro.)
I hope I haven't ruined anything for you.
First of all, go see this movie. It's smarter and better done than 95% of what's out there and a welcome respite from some very bad movie seasons. It is simply a well made film, with excellent acting, production values, excellent special effects (that never "show-off" or detract from the plot!), and a very satisfying, well-paced, character-driven story. Worth every bit of your money. Go see it, you won't be sorry.
Some thoughts:
A.) It's not "just a kid movie". Even though the animals talk. Children will love it, mind you, but adults can buy tickets without a prerequisite niece, nephew, son, daughter, street urchin, or other minor accompanying them. This is an intelligent movie that is done very well. All children's movies should treat their audience in such a manner.
B.) It's very true to the original, I could follow the text in my head and match it to the screen. Conversely, there are numerous additions, expansions, and some omissions to the text. For the purists among us, rejoice. You will have plenty of material to gripe and kvetch about for weeks on these and other boards. There will be plenty of opportunity for you to show how smart you are in your maticulous knowledge of C.S. Lewis. Don't pretend you don't like it.
Most changes seem to be of the cinemagraphic kind, the make the movie flow well or increase drama. Lewis' text is very realistic, with events happening over time. These gaps are usually eliminated for the movie. Other events are rearranged or added to give more drama and emotional tension. The beaver's house is fled while the wolves attack, there is an icy river action scene, etc. These scenes seem fine for what they are.
There are many little omissions. There is no stone knife, no scene of the witch hiding as a boulder, Rumblebuffin in not introduced properly nor does he knock down the gates, Aslan doesn't play with the girls, and I do miss the scene of the animals celebrating Christmas. Which brings me to my next point.
C.) I feel the Christian allegory of the movie has been minimized. There is not much you can do in this regard (Aslan's death is so central to the text) but what can be has been. There is no mention that I heard of the Emperor-beyond-the-sea (Narniaspeak for God) of that Aslan is his son or the witch his former executioner. Father Christmas is still in there (no, he doesn't look like a Coca-cola ad Santa) but his impact in minimized with the deletion of the animals celebrating Christmas scene. The director doesn't seem too keen on the whole Christian allegory thing from interviews. I think that's a mistake. This book, more than any other text, made me under salvation. "Edward, Aslan, Witch, got it," is what happened when I read it. It's not obvious to the casual observer, just very well written allegory. Honestly, Gandalf's resurrection is more obvious biblical allegory (although Tolkien swears it isn't, what do authors know?) than Narnia is.
D.) The kids are really kids, not pretend grown-ups. For so long movies have "today's kids" who talk like sarcastic, wise-cracking,immature adults. I hate that, as a teacher kids simply are not that way. These kids are really kids, and well-acted at that. It's so refreshing to have children that are truly believeable as children. Sadly, we are guarenteed posts to the oppostie, by posters whose vision of kids have been shaped by years of Hollywood convincing us that kids really are little smart-mouth adults.
There is also, refreshingly, no hint of sexuality in the movie. The white witch is fierce and beautiful, but not sexualized. This will jar some viewers I'm sure, but I found it quite refreshing for a change. (Hypocrite alert: I'm also the same guy who really liked Charlize Theron in Aeon Flux and Catherine Zeta-Jones in Legend of Zorro.)
I hope I haven't ruined anything for you.