OSR Let's make Shadowdark classes!


log in or register to remove this ad


Whizbang Dustyboots

Gnometown Hero
BOHEMIAN EARSPOON OR BUST!!!
giphy.gif
 


Samloyal23

Adventurer
More seriously, I think it would be more in the Shadowdark style to either:
A) Just say that a katana is a bastard sword (and wakizashi is a short sword, etc.) by a different name
B) Make the new weapons have trade-offs: if it's better in some ways, it has a drawback, too.
The main drawback is just the price.
 



Samloyal23

Adventurer
A little wordy for Shadowdark, but nice flavor.
In retrospect, after seeing comments about it in Facebook groups, I think it may have too many spells. It has less than a Wizard, but it may still be too powerful in comparison. Before I put it in an e-book, I think it needs more work.
 

unnatural 20

Explorer
I wonder how one would go about making a Warcaster-type class, a mage with a golem buddy?
 

Whizbang Dustyboots

Gnometown Hero
I wonder how one would go about making a Warcaster-type class, a mage with a golem buddy?
Hmm, I'd probably take a page from 2024 5E design and have a preset golem stat block. I make a lot of monsters for Shadowdark and leveling up monsters is a pretty straightforward process.

The question then would be how many spells the warcaster gets otherwise. There's a half-caster in the game -- the Knight of St. Ydris -- but they start getting spells at level three, which means two levels of no "casting," which seems disappointing.

So a warcaster would probably need a modified version of full caster progression (maybe a level behind the wizard) and probably use the full wizard list.

Does that sound like a good start? If so, I can whip something up later this week.
 

Remove ads

Top