alsih2o said:
what?!?!
i quote from the website- "He is now reviled by D&D players today for what he did to the game."
i haven't seen hide nor hair of this opinion.
I agree, that does seem odd. Even if everything Frank Trollman said were true (and "Frank"ly, I have to take with a grain of salt anything said by someone with "Troll" in his moniker)

, that would only explain why, at one time (like, 20 years or so ago), he was reviled by (some) D&D players -- not why he would be reviled by D&D players today. Why would younger gamers care about what happened 20 years ago? As for older gamers, the idea of some middle-aged gamer holding a grudge against Gygax for decades on end seems a trifle odd to me. I have this vision of an old lady at a Con that Gary is at going "booo! booo! booo!" a la The Princess Bride (and I don't mean just Lorraine Williams)
Interestingly, I think William Shatner went through a similer period (loved -- then reviled (by some) -- then loved again). So did Joe Clark (for you Canadians out there) and John Deifenbaker (for you OLD Canadians out there) and John A MacDonald (for you old, DEAD Canadians out there).
I think as far as most gamers are concerned today, if they think of Gary Gygax at all, it is as "The Dude who, like, invented the Game. Now pass me a Mountain Dew!" I am not going to get into a debate as to whether most people would be correct to think this (orange juice is healthier, after all), but I do think that is how most people who play D&D think of Gygax, if they are even aware of him. "Reviling" him seems a very strange thing for the average contemporary gamer to do.
Personally, I think of him as a Rock Star (well, sort of). His past foibles are irrelevant to me -- he is in the D&D Pantheon as a Greater God (and Eric Noah, you get to be a Saint).
