Matt Colville weighs in.

[Scribe]

Honestly if WotC had tried to take out 1.0a in court I'm pretty sure the end result would be D&D 7E being full of Sigmarine/Duardin/Orruk/Aelf-type stuff.

Gross.

Signed, WHFB.

 

[Ruin Explorer]

Gross.

Signed, WHFB.

Can a DEAD MAN sign a letter, Scribe? < Stares meaningfully at tombstone of WHFB >

 

[Ruin Explorer]

One of the editions of Hârnmaster was.

I have that one. Somewhere. I also have the Underground notebook and the MC somewhere. Though I think with the MC we eventually transferred it out of the original, falling-apart binder into a generic binder.

 

[Scribe]

Can a DEAD MAN sign a letter, Scribe? < Stares meaningfully at tombstone of WHFB >

 

[Ruin Explorer]

View attachment 274002

I... good point.

 

[MonsterEnvy]

Can a DEAD MAN sign a letter, Scribe? < Stares meaningfully at tombstone of WHFB >

WHFB has an active rpg.

 

[Ruin Explorer]

WHFB has an active rpg.

I know, I was just being difficult - Old World is on the way too and Total War Warhammer 3 sold millions of copies (plenty of people playing Vermintide 2 as well).

 

[Bacon Bits]

Gross.

Signed, WHFB.

On the one hand, I agree.

On the other hand, GW has historically been pretty consistently anti-customer. To the extent that the community jokes about how badly they've been abused. With WotC this all felt like a big change! When I read about the reasoning behind Age of Sigmar, I felt more like, "I don't know what I expected."

 

[Scribe]

On the one hand, I agree.

On the other hand, GW has historically been pretty consistently anti-customer. To the extent that the community jokes about how badly they've been abused. With WotC this all felt like a big change! When I read about the reasoning behind Age of Sigmar, I felt more like, "I don't know what I expected."

I read an article by the guy who wrote the rules for AoS, it was an eye opener, and as bad as I thought it would be considering the state of that 'game' on release.

 

[Haplo781]

Wonder what Matt thinks about the latest news?