boolean said:Many sources indicate that WotC disagrees with you.
Many?
Could you perhaps list 3? Preferably from WotC themselves?
Where is there a stance by WotC that mithral full plate is medium armor?
boolean said:Many sources indicate that WotC disagrees with you.
KarinsDad said:Where is there a stance by WotC that mithral full plate is medium armor?
hong said:Where is there a stance by WotC that it isn't?
James McMurray said:Karinsdad, beyond "I'm adding this phrase" which you've already admitted to doing, do you have anything?
Stalker0 said:Well even if you can't attach the GIWD, you can always do the next one down, and have mithral full plate with 3/- DR...the best of both materials.
From the 3.5 FAQ:KarinsDad said:Many?
Could you perhaps list 3? Preferably from WotC themselves?
Where is there a stance by WotC that mithral full plate is medium armor?
MarkB said:From the 3.5 FAQ:
Is a character proficient with light armor, such as a
rogue, considered to be proficient with mithral breastplate?
What about a character proficient with medium armor,
such as a barbarian—is he considered proficient with
mithral full plate armor?
The description of mithral on page 284 of the Dungeon
Master’s Guide is less precise than it could be in defining how
it interacts with armor proficiency rules. The simplest answer—
and the one that the Sage expects most players and DMs use—
is that mithral armor is treated as one category lighter for all
purposes, including proficiency. This isn’t exactly what the
Dungeon Master’s Guide says, but it’s a reasonable
interpretation of the intent of the rule (and it’s supported by a
number of precedents, including the descriptions of various
specific mithral armors described on page 220 of the Dungeon
Master’s Guide and a variety of NPC stat blocks).
I've highlighted the relevant part of the answer.