D&D General MtG Adventures in the Forgotten Realms Spoiler Thread

[Parmandur]

 

[Charlaquin]

Skeletons letting you venture when they die is cute.

 

[Charlaquin]

View attachment 139345

Hey, I think I understand this one without a translation!

 

[MoonSong]

Hey, I think I understand this one without a translation!

Interestingly so did I.

Wow, Orcus in Rakdos colors. I think Asmodeus will be Orzov then.

 

[Dausuul]

How is Planar Ally not an Angel Ally?

Orcus is interesting. I guess he wants to be in a deck full of cheap creatures in the 0-2 mana range, so you can either reanimate a bunch of them or buff them all to colossal size. Super mana hungry though.

 

[Charlaquin]

Interestingly so did I.

Wow, Orcus in Rakdos colors. I think Asmodeus will be Orzov then.

Black/red seems pretty fitting for D&D demons in MTG to me. Red for the chaotic, black for the evil (not that black is necessarily evil in MTF, but it is egoistic, which evil in D&D also is.) Devils I could see as either white/black or blue/black, given that order is something white and blue share. But I think white/black is the more likely direction.

 

[Parmandur]

Black/red seems pretty fitting for D&D demons in MTG to me. Red for the chaotic, black for the evil (not that black is necessarily evil in MTF, but it is egoistic, which evil in D&D also is.) Devils I could see as either white/black or blue/black, given that order is something white and blue share. But I think white/black is the more likely direction.

Rakdos ≈ Chsotic Evil
Orzhov ≈ Lawful Evil
Dimir ≈ Neutral Evil
Golgari ≈ True Neutral

?

Ish?

 

[Charlaquin]

Rakdos ≈ Chsotic Evil
Orzhov ≈ Lawful Evil
Dimir ≈ Neutral Evil
Golgari ≈ True Neutral

?

Ish?

If we’re talking about the actual guilds, I think Dimir are far too rigidly structured to be considered neutral evil. They’re just a different flavor of lawful evil than Orzhov. And I think Golgari are far too sinister to count as true neutral; definitely neutral evil in my opinion. If we’re talking just about the color combinations, I think they all cover too broad a conceptual space to fall under one alignment. You might as well map the zodiac signs to the five colors, or assign alignments to MBTI types.

 

[Cadence]

Rakdos ≈ Chsotic Evil
Orzhov ≈ Lawful Evil
Dimir ≈ Neutral Evil
Golgari ≈ True Neutral

?

Ish?

This seemed not unreasonable to me as a start... Loreley Writes - Color Pie Friday : Aligning the Colors

It's a bit restrictive. For example, some of the Black cards (like Yaheeni) aren't evil.

 

[Bardic Dave]

Black/red seems pretty fitting for D&D demons in MTG to me. Red for the chaotic, black for the evil (not that black is necessarily evil in MTF, but it is egoistic, which evil in D&D also is.) Devils I could see as either white/black or blue/black, given that order is something white and blue share. But I think white/black is the more likely direction.

“Zariel, Archduke of Avernus” is the red planeswalker. I’m not too up on FR lore, but she’s a devil, right?