In an abstract sense, is there a difference (in sports or otherwise) between breaking a rule and cheating? I mean, in football, every single time a penalty is called, that means a player broke the rules, right? In addition to in game penalties, it seems quite a few players get fined for infractions as well. Are they all "cheaters"? Or did they break rules and get the appropriate penalty for it?
I mean you can claim that any given late hit or holding call was accidental on the part of the penalized player, but then, you can claim that a coach misinterpreted the rules of where you could or couldn't tape from, too.
Is there a rules infraction which does not make the person who did it a cheater? Is it accepting cheating to say yes, or demeaning "real" cheating* by saying no?
*A bit of personal perspective on this, not precisly an argument, so feel free to ignore : [sblock]My highschool was fairly well known for wrestling - several state or regional championships under the same coach, lots of community pride, etc etc. Then they were caught cheating. And when I say cheating, I mean that at a home match, the team's recorded weigh ins, observed by the coach and under the responsibility of the assistant principal in charge of athletics, were 10 to 15 lbs lower than their weights when another team politely asked them to repeat those in public. It was a scandal, it was the end of a couple of careers, and it very much tainted past championships. In my mind, the taping incident with the Pats simply doesn't register in the same way. They observed something they were allowed to observe, but in a particular way that had been disallowed. I feel like some folks want it to be in the same dynasty tarnishing category as the weigh in scandal of my youth and that just doesn't click for me. [/sblock]