freyar said:
I don't think they'll be called subraces, but it seems (at this point, given that we know only a little!) that they will effectively be subraces. Matter of semantics?
I don't think it
is a matter of semantics. After all, races--more so than almost any other mechanic--are differentiated as much by flavor as by mechanics. Using 3.5 as an example, one could easily call half-elves "elves" and true elves "fey," and it would work just fine without changing the mechanics.
So if they write the elves as being an offshoot of the eladrin, and being very similar except for one or two differences, it's a subrace. If they write them as separate races that happen to spring from the same stock, they're related races.
I guess it's semantics as much as the differences between humans and dwarves are "semantic."
Depends if you like how it was to start.

I haven't used eladrin myself and am only sort of familiar with them through recent Dungeon adventures (including STAP), but I like what I see.

One thing this seems to indicate, though, is a continuing separation of the cosmologies of the different settings, like the devil-demon revision does; I guess I like the idea of a unified cosmology (which I will certainly feel free to use, no matter the edition

). I also have to say that this feels somewhat like the 4e fluff is being redone just because WotC can redo it, without other deep reasons.
Obviously, one's prior preferences are going to have an impact. No argument there.
I have it easier than some, because I didn't care for the plethora of different types of celestials. I found a lot of them unnecessary, and I've never used an eladrin in my life. I'm happy to see them reshaped to be more fey creatures; I think it fits them better.
And while I like the idea of a unified cosmology, ala Planescape, I like it as its own setting. I
don't like it as the assumed default for other settings. (The unique setup of the planes is one of my favorite aspects of Eberron, f'rinstance.) And yes, I realize that may negate my use of the term "unifying," but there it is.

You know, I get the sense that we're all just talking about whether we like the setting or not, but that's perhaps a different thread, for another day (well, until I get my rest -- I'm like a 3e wizard, out of posts per day

).
We may well be.

I happen to like most of what I've learned of the new setting, just as I like most of what I've learned of 4E in general, but I understand why others are less accepting of it than I am.