I'm not following you. How is this germane to the issue at hand?Notmousse said:With the exception of the Orb of Force energy resistance applies to all the orb spells. Natural or magical fire is resisted by Fire Resistance.
Henry said:I think his point is that the spell itself is contradictory. It's non-magical fire, and doesn't require fuel. In other words, it sits around indefinitely not needing magic to sustain itself because of what kind of magic it is.
James McMurray said:The spell states that the fire remains around indefinitely, not requiring fuel?
If the spell has an instantaneous duration, the created object or creature is merely assembled through magic. It lasts indefinitely and does not depend on magic for its existence.
Now, if one states that this rule does not apply because the conjuration creation spell creates an effect instead of a creature or object, then the spell does not belong in the conjuration creation subschool of magic because conjuration creation spells only create creatures or objects by definition.
Notmousse said:That was in response to Henry, not yourself. Remember, I am debating several people. I was at any rate, FF9 calls for me to finally beat it. I shall return later.
James McMurray said:Really? I can think of at least 8 conjuration spells that create energy (fire, electrical, force, and sonic). It seems rather apparent that WotC feels that Conjuration spells can create energy.
A creation spell manipulates matter to create an object or creature in the place the spellcaster designates (subject to the limits noted above). If the spell has a duration other than instantaneous, magic holds the creation together, and when the spell ends, the conjured creature or object vanishes without a trace.
...
Evocation spells manipulate energy or tap an unseen source of power to produce a desired end. In effect, they create something out of nothing. Many of these spells produce spectacular effects, and evocation spells can deal large amounts of damage.
Quote tags are your friend.Notmousse said:That was in response to Henry, not yourself. Remember, I am debating several people.