I only went on about anything, in response to ALL the negative posts against what I had to say, when I express my personal opinion and people dog pile on it is natural to defend myself. If you notice almost every one of my posts after the first was in response to someone, just like this one. So why is it on me to let it go, when there is a group of people you among them that don't seem to want to let me.
You are perfectly free to keep arguing as long as you like. Agamon never said it was "on you" to let it go. He just suggested letting it go was a more sensible approach than continuing to argue the same thing round and round. If you disagree, keep arguing, and eventually everyone else will let it go because otherwise the argument will go on forever and what's the point? (But you may end up on a lot of Ignore lists as a result.)
Generally speaking, if you go on a forum and say something, and a lot of people think you're wrong, you'll get a lot of responses telling you you're wrong. Whether you then dig in and defend your position, or stop to reconsider what you originally said, is up to you.
Last edited: