Can I just delete JJ Abrams from the timeline? Is that allowed?drops
![]()
runs without looking back
^2
Can I just delete JJ Abrams from the timeline? Is that allowed?drops
![]()
runs without looking back
This discussion brings up an interesting question.
Director's Cuts that are worse that the theatrical cut.
To head off one issue- I will put discussion of Snyder and JLA off-limits. I think that the "Snyder Cut" was a better experience, but it also had a lot of new footage and runtime that could never be widely released in theaters.
Also? Let's not discuss Blade Runner.
Okay, here's my top three-
Apocalypse Now. Don't get me wrong. I love some of the extra footage in the various extended cuts. But as a movie, the theatrical release is the best one.
Donnie Darko. Nope. The director's cut is just not great.
And finally? Anything revisited later by Lucas and Spielberg. Star Wars and ET? Yep. It's not even that all the changes are that bad, it's more that there is a reason that people stop messing with a text when it's done.
There are some notable edit/continuity issues (considering there were 6 replicants going rogue and one is completely unaccounted for), but the fact that people judge it so highly even with that out there says volumes about how well it captures the imagination and emotion of the viewers. And it absolutely is one of my top 10 favorite movies as well.I love film noir but prefer the non-voice over version of Bladerunner. But I am one of those people who thinks it's one of the maybe 10-15 perfect films ever made.
There are a number of cuts around on the internet that take all three movies and cut it down to around 2 hours. It is a much better movie. Not really a director’s cut though. Kind of the opposite.In fairness, I'm pretty sure that the one lesson Peter Jackson learned from the LoTR trilogy is that you can never have too much ... ESPECIALLY ENDINGS!
But yeah, that trilogy already suffered from taking a single book and turning it into a trilogy, and then taking the movies in the trilogy (that were already overstuffed and had pacing issues) and just adding more stuff? No thank you.
I would have liked the actual book ending, in a director's cut.Whenever I hear someone complain about Return of the King's so-called "multiple endings" I know I am dealing with an unserious person whose opinions I don't need to ever consider.![]()
That complaint always sounded weird to me. Major events in my own life always have multiple endings, if they even have endings at all (getting married, starting a new job, buying a house, etc.) But sure, destroying an ancient evil and ending a multi-national war should be the exception, with a single, simple resolution that everyone can agree on.Whenever I hear someone complain about Return of the King's so-called "multiple endings" I know I am dealing with an unserious person whose opinions I don't need to ever consider.![]()
Personally, I like the version without the voiceover, but I also have seen people get very confused without it. As for happy endings? I dislike happy endings almost as much as bards.
Out of curiosity, if somebody wanted to be able to experience and/or convert any media into any other media, is there an economical relatively-easy-to-understand entry-level technology for, say, reel-to-reel or 8-track, or is it definitely the domain of specialists and professionals?
One of the many, many ways stories do not mirror real life.That complaint always sounded weird to me. Major events in my own life always have multiple endings, if they even have endings at all (getting married, starting a new job, buying a house, etc.) But sure, destroying an ancient evil and ending a multi-national war should be the exception, with a single, simple resolution that everyone can agree on.
And with respect to "multiple endings," shame on Tolkien for even making the attempt, amirite?One of the many, many ways stories do not mirror real life.