Yep. That’s why when you find one you boot them from the game.Rules lawyers are gonna rules lawyer.
Whoever knew that the ultimate dystopia would be consumerist ennui?
Rules lawyers are gonna rules lawyer.
Things have gotten pretty pineapply all of a sudden. Im here for it.
Next time remind them that the resulting pile of components will also be modern art.In other unrelated news, my submission for $2 million worth of funding for my scientific experiment where I reduce 100 tons of surplus modern art into component particles in order to identify particles that correspond to "Beauty," has been rejected once again by the philistines of the board.
I enjoy a good rules debate. Reminds me of 3e and the early days of ENWorld.
Admittedly, the word "good" is doing a bit of lifting. But not too much for most civilized netizens.
Agreed, better here than at the table, I always get annoyed when someone wants to break the flow to have a rules discussion.Yep. That’s why when you find one you boot them from the game.
In that case I clearly was, and continue to be, confused about what you are trying to address.
Snarf said:
"If you announce that anyone who disagrees with your position is lying or disingenuous, you should not be surprised if people aren't very interested in having a discussion with you."
You said:
"I know you're mostly just making a joke, but if, to one degree or another, you don't think the latter is true (the first sentence), what are you even arguing about?"
It is not clear if "the latter" is,
- "disingenuous"
- "people aren't very interested in having a discussion with you"
- something else