Pineapple Express: Someone Is Wrong on the Internet?

[Dannyalcatraz]

View attachment 432813

I have made more than one reference to that episode, though without bothering to actually create a meme image.

I just type it like he probably would have.

 

[Saracenus]

It is almost time to turn in and recharge for the night. Today has been calm and even joyful at times. Things must be going my way because this showed up in my feed randomly and it is the perfect capstone for my day. Enjoy the joy.

 

[trappedslider]

It is almost time to turn in and recharge for the night. Today has been calm and even joyful at times.

best kind of days.

 

[trappedslider]

Found the next star trek lego set.

 

[Pale Violet Light]

I confess to getting so deep down the rabbit hole of trying to find a relevant reviewer once that I lost the thread and sent the invite to one of the several people down the list authors. I noticed it about a minute after I hit send and recalled it. :-/

I’ve been frustrated before by the fact that some of my favourite journals will not give explicit rules for what is or isn’t a conflict of interest in nominating reviewers. Can I have worked or published with them before: if so, is there a time limit? What if we’re mates but haven’t published together? What if they were kinda mean to me at a conference, but failed to swear undying enmity? We want to avoid the situation where folks just nominate their mates and rubber-stamp each others’ papers, but the most rigorous application of conflict of interest rules can leave you with almost no viable reviewers.