mamba
Hero
it wasn’t meant as a defenseNot a point in their favor, that.
it wasn’t meant as a defenseNot a point in their favor, that.
Oh absolutely. I could maybe see a second setting book set in the region around the Inner Sea, or something, but nothing like Szass Tam’s Census of Thay or whatever. Five people would buy it, and three of them only because they buy everything FR.No disagreement here. Bit that reality being different than 1993 foes a long way towards explaining WotC product development choices.
SCAG covers a full quarter of the 1E Grey Box and 2E box set maps. Eventually, they may move on to another area, but there is no need to be hasty.
Another way if looking at it is "it's only been 9 years to cover an area larger than Europe," because the broader sword Coast they've been working on is larger than Europe. And the game isn't going anywhere, plenty of time to get around more.A full quarter of the tiny first product for FR the predates everything else, that is not impressive, it's bare minimum.
And the SCAG was published in 2015, I've seen glacier move faster, by 2024 it'll be 9 years old!
I do think they will transition slightly away from the Sword Coast towards the Eastern Heartlands and mayhe the Inner Sea writ large: there isn't a lot if room left in the Sword Coast area for big Adventures.Oh absolutely. I could maybe see a second setting book set in the region around the Inner Sea, or something, but nothing like Szass Tam’s Census of Thay or whatever. Five people would buy it, and three of them only because they buy everything FR.
And they’ve made it clear that they can and will use people from the entire FR in The Sword Coast, and only venture outside it for adventures that still have some tie to the Sword Coast.
That is correct. That is why I said I didn't put any stock in my anecdotal evidence.wait, so you are saying through all of this, you are the only one that cared, the % differ because the number of other people differ, it is either 1 out of 6 or 1 out of 11 (across two groups), with the 1 being you…
Quite the poll![]()
Makes sense.I do think they will transition slightly.away from the Sword Coast towards the Eastern Heartlands and mayhe the Inner Wea writ large: there isn't a lot if room left in the Sword Coast area for big Adventures.
Novels, yes. Reference books, no. Who wants to faff about with an index when you can just tell your phone what you want to know?Just chiming in to point out that…kids literally still read books. Like that hasn’t gone away, books for kids still do numbers, kids still prefer paper books when surveyed about digital vs paper…like the idea they don’t want to “wade theough” paper books is just false.
I don't see any reason to do so long as it's generic fantasyland adventure. Being well known, with lots of content, movies and video games is a huge advantage.I do think they will transition slightly away from the Sword Coast towards the Eastern Heartlands and mayhe the Inner Sea writ large: there isn't a lot if room left in the Sword Coast area for big Adventures.
I felt the same way when they trotted out Wiess and Hickman for new Dragonlance novels.No one is saying the new stuff is bad, but it isn't the same as it was, and as using him in the new product was clearly because he was associated with the brand originally, his presence here now serves no purpose other than to entice fans of his older style to buy something they otherwise might not.
Setting books are only partly reference books. They are just as much books meant to be read for their own sake.Novels, yes. Reference books, no. Who wants to faff about with an index when you can just tell your phone what you want to know?
People who enjoy reading about imaginary worlds, and people who enjoy playing Dungeons & Dragons are two different markets, with only limited overlap. As a toy company, Hasbro are interested in the latter, not the former.Setting books are only partly reference books. They are just as much books meant to be read for their own sake.
was that WotC asking them, or did Weiss and Hickman want to write some and checked with WotC for permission?I felt the same way when they trotted out Wiess and Hickman for new Dragonlance novels.
I very much doubt your idea that there is little overlap. I think it’s much closer to a circle on that Venn diagram than it is to two separate circles.People who enjoy reading about imaginary worlds, and people who enjoy playing Dungeons & Dragons are two different markets, with only limited overlap. As a toy company, Hasbro are interested in the latter, not the former.
Considering the hubbub that came with the lawsuit, I dare not speculate.was that WotC asking them, or did Weiss and Hickman want to write some and checked with WotC for permission?
My experience tells me you are very wrong.I very much doubt your idea that there is little overlap. I think it’s much closer to a circle on that Venn diagram than it is to two separate circles.
Your experience isn’t compelling outside your own life, nor is anyone else’s.My experience tells me you are very wrong.
I can't emphasize enough how little I care about what Hasbro wants. I never saw any benefit to the game coming from Hasbro.People who enjoy reading about imaginary worlds, and people who enjoy playing Dungeons & Dragons are two different markets, with only limited overlap. As a toy company, Hasbro are interested in the latter, not the former.