I object to Trevor 'paying' for his +1 longsword. It was given to him by another party member, so the 'cost' for it had already been 'paid' to the party.
Actually, no. The cost has been paid by Coraine, as he had bought this sword himself.
As you can see above, that very same value is added to Coraine's share for giving his old sword into the party pool. If Trevor wouldn't 'pay' for its ownership, then Coraine could essentially not get the value for it, and so Coraine would then effectively pay for Trevor's sword.
Does that sound fair to you?
And, at any rate, this was done long ago, during a previous treasure distribution, so the account should have been settled then!
There has been no actual distribution of ownership, just distribution of use, because it makes little sense to have a magic sword rest in Coraine's backpack while he uses a better one we just found.
But as I said, this is just a proposal, if anyone has a better idea, go ahead.
We can also just hand out the treasure to whoever can use it and
not distribute the gold
at all, but rather use it to buy items for those who have not received much yet. That would work equally well, but with more hassle, because everything that is bought has to be decided as a group.
Bye
Thanee