Note that, at least AFAIK, nothing that would confirm that TIE Fighters post-ANH have no hyperdrives is still canon. Maybe there's more stuff in the new canon books about it.
They’re there to defend the Star Destroyers.Sure, maybe FO TIEs have Hyperdrive ... but then why rely on Star Destroyers to shuttle them around?
Yep, agreed; that’s exactly why lightspeed-skipping was used. I felt that was pretty clear.Presumably lightspeed-skipping, as silly as it was as presented on-screen, is one of the techniques the Resistance have to use in order to defeat the First Order's tracking capabilities. At least they didn't ignore them.
That’s the exact opposite of an inconsistency. It’s a consistency. A new technology was used in TLJ, and it was rolled out by TRoS. It would be an inconsistency if they suddenly forgot about it.And aside from TLJ and the whole "can't track through hyperspace" until they discover it takes a special ship and tech to track through hyperspace ... then all the TIEs in RoS not only have hyperdrive and track through hyperspace.
Lots of inconsistencies. I can live with an occasional retcon, but every film being a new retcon is a bit frustrating.
Oh, crap! Sorry! I must have hit the wrong button. Yes, that was me posting there.@Morrus Did you, perhaps, edit my reply instead of quoting it? Because this is NOT what I posted.
That may or may not have been hyperspace tracking. It's also possible that they simply put out an APB on the Tantiive IV, and their garrison on Tatooine reported its arrival in-system.Wasn't hyperspace tracking a thing in Rogue One/A New Hope? I mean, Vader was able to track the Tantive IV and its Death Star plans through hyperspace. I know they made a big deal about it in The Last Jedi, but I always assumed this was a thing that just happened in the Star Wars universe.