• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

So ... Supergirl

Saw the previews for Supergirl on TV.

Why Supergirl? Why not Superwoman? I mean, it's not like we had Superboy, or Batboy. Even the Wonder Female got the Wonder Woman title. They don't call her Wondergirl.

I'm not trying to be PC here; it would be silly to call the show and the character Superperson. Nor am I on some feminist rant, insisting on Superwomyn. I might be grammatically motivated, but then Stupendous Woman or Excellence Woman might really be more accurate terms.

I mean, really, why Supergirl?
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I mean, it's not like we had Superboy,

Oh, we totally had Superboy.

34568-5261-38611-1-superboy.jpg
superboy.jpg
 




Also there's Hellboy, Kid Flash, Colossal Boy, Beast Boy, Astro Boy, and Lightning Lad, off the top of my head.
 

Seems to me that damned-near half of the "Legion of Superheroes" from the 30th century were something-boy or something-girl.
 

Super girl emphasizes her youth in comparison to her cousin Superman - I'm also expecting to see some commentary on modern sexism and the perception of girls in tights (thats hinted in the costume try-outs)

also if you've seen the trailer the point is specifically called out by Cat Grant as a Girl Power thang
 
Last edited:

It seems there is a trend on shows that bring up someone's origins a lot lately, Gotham, arrow, flash, why not super girl?
 

Why Supergirl? Why not Superwoman? I mean, it's not like we had Superboy, or Batboy.
Probably because the character is a product of the 1950s. She was designed to be subserviant to the male character, Superman, and thus she couldn't be an adult like Superman was. She had to be a younger and less authoritative figure.

Even the Wonder Female got the Wonder Woman title. They don't call her Wondergirl.
Wonder Woman was kind of a feminist icon from the start.
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top