Geoff Watson said:
I've seen a lot of anime, and can't think of any that matches this description.
Then I'd submit that you haven't seen much anime, or that you're off watching a completely different sort. The "Clueless Guy has a Whole Mess of Hot Women Fall in Love with Him but Never Realizes It" stereotype, instead, maybe.
But sorry. I don't remember titles. It's been awhile since I bothered to watch much. I did like Princess Mononoke and Spirited Away, though.
Mog Elffoe said:
One thing that I can say about Neon Genesis Evangelion is that it is definitely NOT 'stereotypical' anime. It may start off like that, but when it hits its turning point it is like nothing that I have ever seen. It doesn't work for me in the slightest, but is different--I'll give it that.
Heh. Well, I did say that I'd only seen one or two episodes. I most likely saw the earlier stuff, then.
argo said:
Point one: the guys at Ginax have been accused of many things over the years, not least of which is of having an unhealthy obsession with young girls (Princess Maker is so wrong) but they have never been accused of a lack of creativity or inventiveness.
There's a first time for everything. But given my whole "only saw one or two episodes" thing, that's not really an accusation for me to make.
Point two: probably the reason it seemed so stereotypical to you is because it is one of the shows that helped establish the stereotypes. Its like accusing Superman of being unorigional because he wears his underwear over his pants... that argument just doesn't work
See, actually, the funny thing is, that argument works perfectly. You seem to be looking at it from an art appreciation viewpoint, where it's important to view the show in the context of being the first show to do X and Y. That's perfectly valid, and viewpoints like yours are often what result in great new stuff coming out. I totally respect that viewpoint. I just don't particularly share it.
I'm coming at it from a consumer viewpoint. The only standard that matters is whether or not I was entertained. I wasn't. It doesn't matter if the reason for my lack of entertainment is that other shows I've seen before shamelessly aped the stuff that this show did for the very first time. That doesn't matter to me at all, because I'm not in art-appreciation mode. As far as I'm concerned, the only real standard is "Have I seen this before, and is this a good enough version of it to merit me watching it again?" For me, the answer was "no".
You aren't obligated to like everything I like. You aren't obligated to approach the things I look at from the art-appreciation standpoint. And I'm not obligated to look for deeper shades of meaning or subtle nuances in a story about people having katana duels with big giant robots.