Andor
First Post
I prefer a larger number of focused classes to a smaller number of general classes.
I thought a lot of PrCs in 3rd ed were very badly written, with descriptions and mechanics that often matched badly, sometimes not at all.
On the other hand core spellcasters could break the laws of physics casually, and the proliferation of non-caster PrCs was in part a (IMO futile) attempt to chase the caster power curve. Denying unrealistic non-magical weapons and techniques while allowing all sorts of magic is IMO a particularly insidious sort of double think.
I disagree but I've already elaborated on why several times. In summation if it's not magic, it shouldn't BE magic. The solution to muggles not keeping up with wizards is to either get rid of muggles, or to reign in the wizards. Making everyone magic while pretending they are not is what 4e did, and it was not a universal success.
Personally I'd rather see wizards given a few at-will style combat spells of minor power, a few (per day) big vancian boom spells and have everything else(Buffs, polymorphs, divination, curses, summoning, etc.) moved over into the ritual spells space. They might be usable in a field battle with a squad protecting the wizard/priest but not in the close quarters small scale action of the dungeon. As a plus thet then gives the bard his own action space as a magic user who has no damaging combat spells but can supply combat speed buffs.