You know, the rules thread doesn't actually say you can't simultaneously upvote and downvote the same entry, so, in the interest of evening things out . . .
Find Traps 24
True Strike 24 (+1 and -2!)
This will henceforth be known as a seevote.
Find Traps 13
True Strike 16
My only goal here is to try and foster a 1-0 final score
Find Traps 14
True Strike 14
I can get behind that.
Because each conventional vote produces a net change of 3 in the difference of the scores, and because the current difference is 0, it follows that with conventional voting, the final difference will have to be a multiple of three. More generally, if the current score difference is equal to x mod 3, then each subsequent score difference will also be equal to x mod 3. In this case x is 0.
But the difference in a (literal) score of 1-0 is equal to 1 mod 3, so if we want the final score to literally be 1-0, some additional seevoting will be necessary. (Strictly speaking, the difference in a score of 0-1 is actually equal to 2 mod 3, but the whole problem is symmetric, so whatever.)
This would have become obvious near the end, I just thought it was interesting that it was predictable.
Math is fun.
Oh.
Having written the above, I guess I will leave it for your amusement, but it's really easier, isn't it? The last vote that produces a score of 1-0 has to be a seevote; the closest that you could get with a conventional vote would be 2-0. (3-0, or 2-(-1) are also possible, but not quite as close.)
EDIT: And because of my first observation, with the score as it is now, no series of conventional votes could result in a score of 2-0 (or 0-2). Math - anything you can do, I can do in a more complicated way.
