stonegod: breaking and entering is chaotic in my book. It's not directly harmful to anyone but whoever has to repair the door, and is an unlawful means to an end, whether evil or good, not an evil end itself.
If you break and enter and leave behind curative potions to heal one of the dwarves' hypothetical dying sister, it's a good end. If you break and enter to bludgeon the dwarves into forcible unconciousness, bind them, and shove them through a porthole to be eaten by sharks, and steal their stuff on the way out... it's not.
James Heard said:
I'm wondering if Dragen's alignment isn't a little off from the one written down on paper myself these days, after having actually ran him for a while. At the very least I'm thinking that at one time Dragen was a whole lot more E than G now that he's seen actual usage.
You know, that maybe I was just thinking of Dragen's good intentions...or maybe he's just too cynical and tired to engage in a proper evil these days.
Dragen's no saint, but his past doesn't (necessarily) equate to being evil. If, as your biography suggested, he's horrified and scarred by (if not quite repentant for) his actions during the Last War, then in my opinion he's neutral. Not a good guy, but no longer a vile killer either. On the other hand, if he's so resigned to how far he's sunken that he would murder more innocents on the basis that it's 'just one more' or something, then I would deem him evil. From what you've written, the former seems more accurate.
And after all, there's always room for growth and change--the game has just started.
You haven't even killed anyone yet.
