When someone doesn’t believe you fundamentally can even be right? Is it even worth talking to them?

When someone doesn’t believe you fundamentally can even be right? Is it even worth talking to them?
Could be worse. You could be offering them an alternate viewpoint or way to conceptualize a thing that might not stick in their craw as much, and they castigate you for telling them what to do and accuse you of gaslighting them.When someone doesn’t believe you fundamentally can even be right? Is it even worth talking to them?
He said everyone else is obviously wrong. Why would I bother?Could be worse. You could be offering them an alternate viewpoint or way to conceptualize a thing that might not stick in their craw as much, and they castigate you for telling them what to do and accuse you of gaslighting them.
I'm not disagreeing.He said everyone else is obviously wrong. Why would I bother.
Ah. Yea…I'm not disagreeing. I got misrepresented and attacked by someone I admire, and just had to disengage.
Not big fans of Omega Red, I take it?
It begs the question: why do they keep playing? What keeps them coming back, week after week, to torture themselves with something they so clearly despise?
I guess we know where Nate Silver has been since leaving FiveThirtyEight.Is there a point of saturation for discussions of survey methodology? At some point will every thread be about the 70% threshold? Will EN World one day become a site entirely about the efficacy of WotC surveys?
Real talk: No one should ever have a V-8 other than extremely lazy Bloody Mary enthusiasts.Just because you didn't notice something, doesn't mean you need to double-down on enhancing its ambiguity. It just means you missed a connection. That's not shameful. Slap your forehead, say "I could have had a V-8," and move on.