The "I Didn't Comment in Another Thread" Thread

[payn]

Shrimp & White Wine

 

[Cadence]

Shrimp & White Wine Sauvignon

FTFY

Could also do Prawns and Pino

 

[prabe]

Oh, look. We're back to everyone talking about the same thing from forty different angles again. Yay.

 

[billd91]

Oh, look. We're back to everyone talking about the same thing from forty different angles again. Yay.

And don't forget the casting of aspersions. Can't forget those.

 

[CleverNickName]

I love it when people start arguing about what they did and did not say.
In an internet chat forum.
Where everything is recorded in writing.
It's searchable. Quotable, even.

You have complete control over the clarity and intent of your writing. If folks are misunderstanding the things you write, or if they're twisting your words, you can make your writing more clear...you can make your words less twisty. Just as an example: you could maybe stop using absolutes like "best," "worst," "always," "never," "nobody," and "everybody."

 

[RealAlHazred]

And don't forget the casting of aspersions. Can't forget those.

Aspersions
Disenchantment cantrip (bard, nerd, wizard)
Casting Time: 1 action
Range: 1 forum
Components: S (technically...)
Duration: Instantaneous

You unleash a string of thinly-veiled insults masquerading as wit at a creature you can communicate with in one forum. If the target can read your post (though it need not understand it), it must succeed on a Wisdom saving throw; it it fails, you honestly believe the target took 1d4 psychic damage and it must spend its next action crafting a strongly-worded response.

At Higher Levels. This spell’s damage appears to increase by 1d4 and it can affect additional targets when you reach 5th level (2d4, 2 targets), 11th level (3d4, 4 targets), and 17th level (4d4, 8 targets spread across 2 closely-aligned forums).

 

[CleverNickName]

One small change: you only think that you've dealt damage to your target. Change the wording in the last sentence to:
"it must succeed on a Wisdom save. If it fails, you honestly believe it took 1d4 psychic damage..."

 

[RealAlHazred]

One small change: you only think that you've dealt damage to your target. Change the wording in the last sentence to:
"it must succeed on a Wisdom save. If it fails, you honestly believe it took 1d4 psychic damage..."

Made some changes.

 

[Snarf Zagyg]

You unleash a string of thinly-veiled insults massquerading as wit at a creature you can communicate with in one forum.

There is an inseparable gulf between casting aspersions and wit; wit has the stench of truth to it, while insults (however funny) are simply calisthenics with words.
-Don Rickles.

 

[prabe]

Is the delicious barleywine mislabeled as a Scotch Ale a good beer or a bad one?