The Making of the Misadventures of the Star Wars Iconic Characters...

Hey, Jack, how about letting Valara switch out a less-used feat (*cough*toughness*cough*) for WGP Blaster Pistols? I don't think there'd be any continuity issues that way.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Now, now... technically, a sling doesn't take any more time to load and fire than a blaster does. I know that doesn't sound right logically, but that's how the rules work.

Alright Valara, here's the deal...

When we first went over your stats, we discovered that you had both Dodge and Mobility which require a 13+ Dex that you didn't have. You swapped them both out for Improved Initiative and Heroic Surge. If you would like to change (again) one of those two feats to WP (blaster pistols), we can do that.
 

Hmm, doesn't look like any of the changes are major for me. Shame about the Defense bonus dropping though :(

Jack Haggerty said:
When we first went over your stats, we discovered that you had both Dodge and Mobility which require a 13+ Dex that you didn't have. You swapped them both out for Improved Initiative and Heroic Surge. If you would like to change (again) one of those two feats to WP (blaster pistols), we can do that.

:rolleyes: Yeesh... Who put the stats together for us?
 


The best thing we could have done is scrapped the wotc stats and designed our own to fit the character better, at least then we could say that the mistakes never got past an editor.
 

Valara Saar said:
The best thing we could have done is scrapped the wotc stats and designed our own to fit the character better, at least then we could say that the mistakes never got past an editor.

Yeah, I agree... but since there are "official" stats for some of the characters, it'd be nice to stick with them.

But, if we did do it, now would be the time to do it. What does everyone else think? Should we build our own "Revised Iconic" statstics?
 

Jack Haggerty said:


Yeah, I agree... but since there are "official" stats for some of the characters, it'd be nice to stick with them.

But, if we did do it, now would be the time to do it. What does everyone else think? Should we build our own "Revised Iconic" statstics?

Hi, Wotc had stats for some of us when we started, but not all, and often incorrect. Assume the same is true for you, we just pretty much ignored there stats and created out own. Still trying to keep within the iconic character as much as possible(Pure single class, no multiclass, nothing that didn't fit the sterotypical class example)

Of course this is your game and you all can do it however you like, just thought I would share some of the wisdom of experience. :)

By the way, you should really try to enjoy this Jungle more instead of trying to get back to your overly technological world, that Corruscant, saddens me.
 

I think the stats should be redone on general principles. An actually good reason to redo them makes it even more palatable. We were designed for the old rules, incorrectly I might add, We should recreate ourselves in the new rules so that everything is nice and neat.
 

Vadania said:
Wotc had stats for some of us when we started, but not all, and often incorrect. Assume the same is true for you, we just pretty much ignored there stats and created out own. Still trying to keep within the iconic character as much as possible(Pure single class, no multiclass, nothing that didn't fit the sterotypical class example)

Of course this is your game and you all can do it however you like, just thought I would share some of the wisdom of experience. :)

By the way, you should really try to enjoy this Jungle more instead of trying to get back to your overly technological world, that Corruscant, saddens me.

Excellent advise all around. Thank you Vadania. Out of curiosity, did you guys just use the "standard" stat block, or point buy?

Vadania said:
I think the stats should be redone on general principles. An actually good reason to redo them makes it even more palatable. We were designed for the old rules, incorrectly I might add, We should recreate ourselves in the new rules so that everything is nice and neat.

I'm leaning toward that... But it'd have to be everyone or no one. So, what's the vote?
 

Jack Haggerty said:


I'm leaning toward that... But it'd have to be everyone or no one. So, what's the vote?

I don't have any real complaints about Arani's write-up in the adventure game (says the girl with the 18 dex) but I have no objections to everyone being rewritten to place them on an even (and sensible) footing. Especially since I'm the one that made the characters written up from scratch use the standard array in the first place.
 

Remove ads

Top