Vegepygmy
First Post
Please tell us where in the rulebooks we can find the definition of "property" that you're relying on to make this argument. Absent that, I think you're just making stuff up.Being epic or not is not a property of a weapon.
Please tell us where in the rulebooks we can find the definition of "property" that you're relying on to make this argument. Absent that, I think you're just making stuff up.Being epic or not is not a property of a weapon.
That reasoning is definitely flawed. "Adamantine" is not an enchantment either. A weapon cannot ever become 'adamantine' unless it was originally made from adamantite. A weapon can definitely become 'epic' by adding enchantments to it, though.Being epic or not is not a property of a weapon. There is no "Epic" enchantment, like there is a Holy enchantment; nor can your weapon be made of "Epic", as it can be made of Adamantine. "Epic" is merely the name you tack onto any weapon that is a certain amount of 'powerful'.
That reasoning is definitely flawed. "Adamantine" is not an enchantment either. A weapon cannot ever become 'adamantine' unless it was originally made from adamantite. A weapon can definitely become 'epic' by adding enchantments to it, though.
Apples/Oranges/Cucumbers. There's no rule to be derived from any of these comparisons.
Imho, in the end it's a simple question of balance: Do you (as the DM) feel it is balanced to allow a 'transmuting' weapon to emulate an 'epic' weapon or not?
For me the answer is clear: It's not.
Fair enough.Regarding making stuff up: maybe - I'm just trying to come up with a reasoning to explain something that seems very plain to me.
Oops, I stand corrected then.Also, you can enchant a weapon so it's 'considered adamantine' - using the Metalline enchantment.