Ok so the contention is about whether or not the Ready action used to cast a spell is actually a Magic Action. I don't have a horse in this race, but something about that bugs me. If I have Warcaster, and I cast a single-action spell in response to a provoked opportunity attack as a reaction- am I also considered to be taking the Magic Action?
Because I was under the assumption reactions were their own action, not a subset of other actions. If I make a weapon attack as a reaction, that's not the Attack Action, for example. If I ready an action to pull a lever or close a door, that's not the "Use an Object" action...right?
It just feels like "cast a spell as normal" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. Either way, I don't play 2024 and I do agree that this seems to go against the intent of the spellcasting rules (although it's not the only thing that does that, and that intent, ie, preventing someone from casting two spells using spell slots already runs into issues with spells that don't use spell slots, ie, you can have the same spell, requiring the same action, coming from different sources, but if one is cast using a trait and the other a spell slot, we have this dubious rule coming in to stop it. Like, cast Mage Armor as a Wizard- spell slot, no using another spell slot this turn. Cast Mage Armor with a Warlock Invocation, oh sure, you can use a spell slot to cast another spell, that's just fine- no explanation for why or how, it just is.

)