See, there you go, it's not even mentioned in the current edition that most people here play (or the not so current edition that I play).VirgilCaine said:It's a note in the back of the 1e DMG.
If it ISN'T so, then explain to me why the weapon weights are so off.
Well, let's look at some of the swords, just as an example. The longsword, as shown in the 3.5 SRD weighs in at 4 lbs. I went through all of my sources, which include archaeological dig catalogs, museum inventory catalogs, various weapon reference books, and personal handling of weapons. I could not find a non-ceremonial weapon that would classify as a longsword that weighed more than 3.3 lbs., and that is being generous in our definition.
A greatsword in D&D, which could be classified as a two-handed sword or a flamberge, weighs a staggering 8 lbs. according to the SRD! In all my research I could not find a non-ceremonial two-handed sword that weighed more than 6 lbs. Presentation pieces, or ceremonial pieces (those not designed for combat) all are made of lesser quality steel, and in consequence, weigh a lot more. Ceremonial pieces can weigh well over 10 lbs for a greatsword.
I also looked at a few other things a minute ago. Ten sling bullets weigh 5 lbs., which means that each sling bullet weighs a half pound. Now, if we made the sling bullets out of cast lead we're looking at sling bullets that are just about 1.5 cubic inches each. I've never seen a sling bullet that big myself, but it's marginally possible.
I guess I am just saying that whoever made the weapon weights did not do their research well. With a few exceptions, I would say most of the weapon weights are too heavy, some ridiculously so.