What 5e got wrong


log in or register to remove this ad


Actually, that quote acknowledges that 3d6 is the assumed system, and indicates the four listed methods as alternatives to the standard assumed method - it just does so in the least direct way possible.

I read the quote as acknowledging a system the reader is probably aware of so it outlines the reasons for rejecting it in this edition before presenting appropriate alternatives for character creation.
 

There are not 4 offered systems. There are 4 alternative systems offered as your quote rightly points out. They have to be alternative to something, and that something is 3d6.

No, what the section is saying is 3d6 is inappropriate, here are systems that are appropriate, the writer does not care which, if any, you choose to use in your game. Each is satisfactory and has advantages/disadvantages to the others. Pick one.
 

No, what the section is saying is 3d6 is inappropriate, here are systems that are appropriate, the writer does not care which, if any, you choose to use in your game. Each is satisfactory and has advantages/disadvantages to the others. Pick one.

Oooookay. I guess you don't understand what "alternative" means. If what you said is true and there is no default 3d6, then it's impossible for "alternative" to apply to any of the four methods.
 

No, what the section is saying is 3d6 is inappropriate, here are systems that are appropriate, the writer does not care which, if any, you choose to use in your game. Each is satisfactory and has advantages/disadvantages to the others. Pick one.


No, what the DMG quote states is that it can be difficult to generate successful characters with the 3d6 default, and explicitly "suggests" 4 "alternative" methods. If any of the 4 listed methods were the default method, they wouldn't be indicated in the text explicitly as suggestions of alternative (not default) methods.
 

Oooookay. I guess you don't understand what "alternative" means. If what you said is true and there is no default 3d6, then it's impossible for "alternative" to apply to any of the four methods.

'Alternative' does not require a default: it requires other choices be available.

If I'm asked "What do you want for supper?" and I reply "I don't want steak, but spaghetti, pizza, penne, or linguine would be good." I have presented 4 alternatives. But that doesn't make steak the default. It makes steak a rejected option. There is no default in the list of Italian foods that appeal to me.
 

No, what the DMG quote states is that it can be difficult to generate successful characters with the 3d6 default, and explicitly "suggests" 4 "alternative" methods. If any of the 4 listed methods were the default method, they wouldn't be indicated in the text explicitly as suggestions of alternative (not default) methods.

I agree there is no default method. 3d6 can't be default since it isn't presented as a method to use; it is presented as method to avoid.

The closest to default is 4d6 drop lowest because (1) it is listed first and people work that way, (2) it is referenced later in the book, and (3) it is by far the least cumbersome with minimal bookkeeping, requires the least analysis, and is fastest generation method presented.
 

Again, the reason Gygax treats it as a "default" is because he is writing the Advanced rule set for an existing game in which 3d6 is default.

He states that for advanced players the default method of D&D is apparently no good, and presents the methods he thinks would work best for AD&D.
 

'Alternative' does not require a default: it requires other choices be available.

If I'm asked "What do you want for supper?" and I reply "I don't want steak, but spaghetti, pizza, penne, or linguine would be good." I have presented 4 alternatives. But that doesn't make steak the default. It makes steak a rejected option. There is no default in the list of Italian foods that appeal to me.

You gave exactly 0 alternatives there. What you gave were 4 options, not alternatives, for dinner. Options =/= alternatives. The only way to provide alternatives is if there is something already offered up as the default. Here is a correct dinner analogy.

You: What's for dinner?
Wife: Steak
You: I don't want steak, but spaghetti, pizza, penne or linguine would be good.

There we have a steak default for dinner and you giving alternatives for what was already given. In 1e 3d6 is the default method, which allows for alternatives. If it wasn't, then...

This: "Four alternatives are offered for player characters:"

would have been...

This: "Four options are offered for player characters:"
 

Remove ads

Top