Also just an aside, guys... No need to get heated or laugh at each other. It's stat generation. Not politics or religion.![]()
Actually, that quote acknowledges that 3d6 is the assumed system, and indicates the four listed methods as alternatives to the standard assumed method - it just does so in the least direct way possible.
There are not 4 offered systems. There are 4 alternative systems offered as your quote rightly points out. They have to be alternative to something, and that something is 3d6.
No, what the section is saying is 3d6 is inappropriate, here are systems that are appropriate, the writer does not care which, if any, you choose to use in your game. Each is satisfactory and has advantages/disadvantages to the others. Pick one.
No, what the section is saying is 3d6 is inappropriate, here are systems that are appropriate, the writer does not care which, if any, you choose to use in your game. Each is satisfactory and has advantages/disadvantages to the others. Pick one.
Oooookay. I guess you don't understand what "alternative" means. If what you said is true and there is no default 3d6, then it's impossible for "alternative" to apply to any of the four methods.
No, what the DMG quote states is that it can be difficult to generate successful characters with the 3d6 default, and explicitly "suggests" 4 "alternative" methods. If any of the 4 listed methods were the default method, they wouldn't be indicated in the text explicitly as suggestions of alternative (not default) methods.
'Alternative' does not require a default: it requires other choices be available.
If I'm asked "What do you want for supper?" and I reply "I don't want steak, but spaghetti, pizza, penne, or linguine would be good." I have presented 4 alternatives. But that doesn't make steak the default. It makes steak a rejected option. There is no default in the list of Italian foods that appeal to me.