Scribe
Legend
I must be missing out on quite a winner.Each and every word in that sentence could have multiple meanings! As a group, we should dissect each one!
I must be missing out on quite a winner.Each and every word in that sentence could have multiple meanings! As a group, we should dissect each one!
@AcererakTriple6 about warforged in other worlds. I agree they don’t really fit as a race, but as a one off, or a reskin of other artificial beings they would have a place in most settings
IMHO, Warforged do not necessarily fit as a race in other campaign worlds as-written with Eberron's take on them. But they would not be hard, again IMO, to drop them into some other setting like Greyhawk and declare that "Warforged were creations of the Suel Imperium for use in the Baklunish-Suloise Wars. Thought to be extinct in the Rain of Colorless Fire, the Warforged have woken from their slumber after numerous generations. Their total numbers and current purpose remain unknown."Yep. That was basically my point. Warforged as a race/culture are specific to Eberron. An individual, unique Warforged in any other world could work. In Theros, they could have been created by Purphoros. In Ravnica, the Izzet Guild. In the Forgotten Realms, they could be an advanced form of a Nimblewright or Netherese construct. In Exandria, they'd probably be an Aeormaton.
There are a few settings that I don't think they'd fit in at all (Dark Sun, for example), but in most D&D worlds, as a one-of-a-kind character, they certainly could fit.
"Zagyg did it..."Heck in Greyhawk there are a million possible things. Given the pretty constant state of warfare depending on period, there’s lots of possible sources - Scarlet Brotherhood, Iuz, etc. Heck other planet isn’t all that out of line. They fell from the sky isn’t terribly strange for Greyhawk.
You can do that, but it leads to blandification. First the races must lose a lot of definition to become generic and then worlds become more similar to each other by all including those same generic races. I'd rather have worlds that have their own unique character and that included unique races. And yes, this also means that there doesn't need to be elves and dwarves in every setting.I find that the vast majority (though not quite all) arguments of the form "X only fits in setting Y, and not anywhere else" or even "X just isn't appropriate for D&D" demonstrate an argument from incredulity rather than any actual problem with the combination. In the case of warforged, you just generalize the concept to the broader class of "artificial lifeform" and suddenly it fits in quite well. Consider the Greek myths of Talos. Pandora, and Galatea for classical examples of inanimate objects brought to life, or myths about Daedalus being such a gifted craftsman that his statues were not merely lifelike, but actually had to be tied down so they wouldn't walk away.
Warforged--presumably by some other name--are quite compatible with most settings, but as others have noted above, they may be more like one-off or rarely-made entities rather than mass-produced soldiers as they are in Eberron. As with most things, you need to adapt the creation and details in order to make things work in a given setting. We don't have Elves that spent immortal centuries under only starlight created directly by the one true deity of all reality, nor Dwarves that were originally created by the impatient god-like master of the forge who wanted students to teach and helpers to work alongside; each setting has different founding myths (or lack thereof!) for all of its races, as it should.
I get the reasoning.You can do that, but it leads to blandification. First the races must lose a lot of definition to become generic and then worlds become more similar to each other by all including those same generic races. I'd rather have worlds that have their own unique character and that included unique races. And yes, this also means that there doesn't need to be elves and dwarves in every setting.
Let me smugly tell you what 'sentence' means just to increase the aggression in the thread.Each and every word in that sentence could have multiple meanings! As a group, we should dissect each one!
Your view is valid. WotC seems to want each setting to support the main species and classes (and visaversa).I get the reasoning.
I just think that that ship sailed a LOOONG time ago.
There is just no way that WotC is going to present a major setting (as opposed to a sort of one book once off like Theros) with any support that doesn't include all the main races and classes. Gone are the days where picking up a given setting meant that you had to put 3/4 of your gaming collection on the shelf because you couldn't use it in that setting.
Like it or not, moving forward, settings are going to include all the major races, certainly all the PHB races, in some form or other - like replacing Dray with Dragonborn a la 4e Dark Sun.
The goal, I suppose, is to differentiate the different races culturally, rather than simply presenting monolithic race/cultures.