Paul Farquhar
Legend
Why would someone buy four copies (without even checking it out first) if they are not a fan?The value to my mind is to see the opinion of something known not to be a WotC fan.
Does not make sense.
Why would someone buy four copies (without even checking it out first) if they are not a fan?The value to my mind is to see the opinion of something known not to be a WotC fan.
That's true, but possibly overrated.I do agree it would be hard for any of us to judge the suitability of this box for completely new players without giving it to some and letting them learn to play it without help.
They didn't though. They did the exact same thing that I did, only I did it with more groups (though some of my groups had a few experienced, or at least, 'have played a few sessions' players). I played with some people who didn't know which dice were which!Unless you've done that (as the OP has to some degree),
We can, though. Just not perfectly. For example, I have spent decades learning to understand the difference between my own knowledge and the capabilities of a new player. I can tell you from experience that the real truth is... they are all different. It's unfortunate that @GreyLord didn't have anyone in the group who managed to read the Read Me First and understand it, or spot the big red Spell DC box on their Character Card. That was bad luck.we can't learn how it's intended to work because our own experience colors our choices and reasoning.
So you think having and voicing an uninformed opinion adds value to the conversation in some way? How exactly?
Repeating or credulously amplifying misinformation is definitely not of value.
It's certainly possible to have meaningful contributions to a discussion about a book one hasn't read, a movie one hasn't seen, or a game product one hasn't played with or even read, but there are obviously some limits and lines.
Apropos of nothing...have y'all heard the Good Word of the Ignore feature?In general, I'm personally tired of the negativity that has infused online discourse. It takes little courage or effort to say something sucks, is overrated, or someone is a hack, so I tend to push back. I get a sense that negative views are often expressed in a condescending way, that someone is wrong for liking things, and that the critic is the smarter party for rejecting it. I like horror movies, and the negativity and complaining that dominates those spaces is draining. I'm often left wondering if they even enjoy the genre they claim to be fans of or just like griping?
Actually liking something requires conviction and putting yourself out there, so all things being equal, I respect it more, even if I don't agree.
They seem to have a problem with online stuff.Why would someone buy four copies (without even checking it out first) if they are not a fan?
Does not make sense.
I think the problem is that you can't let misinformation stand on the internet uncommented.Apropos of nothing...have y'all heard the Good Word of the Ignore feature?
Well, I certainly wouldn't have done that.Why would someone buy four copies (without even checking it out first) if they are not a fan?
Does not make sense.
I was referring to whatever the back and forth was about, as it seems like a bunch of people calling for reason and positivity for some reasonI think the problem is that you can't let misinformation stand on the internet uncommented.
So if everyone ignores it, people who google search for the new starter ser might somehow find exactly this review...
Ironically you are responding to someone who has blocked me.The trouble with ignore is that sometimes people have something interesting to say (or just something I agree with).
But of evwry interaction is "please stop dragging the conversation down, this feels like threadcrapping"...maybe not worth the risk.The trouble with ignore is that sometimes people have something interesting to say (or just something I agree with).