D&D General Whom has used the Egg of Coot?


log in or register to remove this ad


Nowadays, I'd probably be even more meta with the Egg of Coot (bringing this back to the topic). Make it a memetic hazard. The reason why people describe it in contradictory ways is because the information itself causes havoc in minds: hallucinations, confusion, psychosis, etc. No living creature can describe it, and if nonliving things are used to gather information, that just delays the effect -- as soon as you view the information from the drone's footage, you are yourself affected because it is the information itself that is harmful. For reference, check out "The Riddle of the Universe and Its Solution" by Chris Cherniak, or any of David Langford's several stories featuring Basilisks: "BLIT", "comp.basilisk FAQ", "What Happened at Cambridge IV", and "Different Kinds of Darkness". In this case, the "person" referred to as the Egg of Coot could be an individual who has had a very drastic reaction to the infohazard; perhaps they even do have some special connection, but that just makes that individual a vector for the spread of the hazard (similar to the movie, "The Crazies").
 

You can see the Egg of Coot in this photo taken by a brave individual who is no longer with us. See it there, under her breast, just being as evil as can be. Disgusting.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20251009-114523.png
    Screenshot_20251009-114523.png
    1.1 MB · Views: 14

Cool. I'm sure he's fine, and maybe he was around for usenet, too. But this was a random question that didn't have a source, and apparently it is from a youtube video.

When it comes to TTRPG history, I don't do youtube. We have excellent books and actual source documents. Call me old-fashioned, but I try to do historical research on TTRPGs from written sources and not from internet personalities, whether pretty old or pretty young.

ETA- to get this back on topic, I still do not know what this is about. I assume it's about the later references in the DA series of modules.
I always enjoy your well-researched threads, Snarf, and can appreciate that you would prefer to "go the primary source" as much as possible rather than get information from secondary sources like Mr Welch (I happen to be a big fan of his, but I'm not going to try to convince you to like him; different strokes for different folks). I would humbly suggest that there are some worthy nuggets of TTRPG history to be found on Youtube coming from "primary sources" so perhaps do not discount it entirely.

Interviews with some of Arneson and Gygax's original D&D players I find fascinating, for example - I found David Megarry's Dungeon! channel was a good place to start (here: David Megarry's Dungeon! ) but I have seen a number of interesting interviews with some of the oldest of old-timers over the years and I think even if the information comes in the form of oral history, the fact it's from primary sources makes it in my eyes as valuable as written history compiled later (the best sources are of course contemporaneous written sources).
 

I always enjoy your well-researched threads, Snarf, and can appreciate that you would prefer to "go the primary source" as much as possible rather than get information from secondary sources like Mr Welch (I happen to be a big fan of his, but I'm not going to try to convince you to like him; different strokes for different folks). I would humbly suggest that there are some worthy nuggets of TTRPG history to be found on Youtube coming from "primary sources" so perhaps do not discount it entirely.

Interviews with some of Arneson and Gygax's original D&D players I find fascinating, for example - I found David Megarry's Dungeon! channel was a good place to start (here: David Megarry's Dungeon! ) but I have seen a number of interesting interviews with some of the oldest of old-timers over the years and I think even if the information comes in the form of oral history, the fact it's from primary sources makes it in my eyes as valuable as written history compiled later (the best sources are of course contemporaneous written sources).

I've touched on on the topic (I'd say briefly, but ... well, you've read me before) here-


But I think that the original responses in the thread might have been misconstrued- the OP was genuinely confusing to me, although I did want to discuss the Egg of Coot (I'm always up for discussions about the good stuff!). As for youtube, I don't deny that there is good stuff on there, but Morrus recently (and IMO wisely) made it a policy to not allow threads to be just "What do you think about this youtube video?" While the written discussion forum might not be the hot thing on the internet (the pivot to video is long past, we are now into the pivot to AI), there is value in written discourse that lasts longer than ephemeral discord chats, and for the most part I don't come to the EnWorld forums to watch videos - unless the person who posts the video explains in some detail what the video is about, why it is relevant to what they are discussing, and convinces me that I should watch the video.

(As a general rule, I find that youtube has some excellent and amazing resources if you seek them out, but they are surrounded by so much terrible click bait slop that I am very hesitant to trust new sources.)
 

In my never-run planning for a Blackmoor campaign, I was going to have the Egg of Coot being a space-warp that had some sort of sentience -- not understandable to humans, but it acted with volition ("insane" acts, but still acts). And the "person" referred to as the Egg of Coot was an older human male, not from Blackmoor but from another Prime Material Plane. He was mad from his experiences "in" the actual Egg, and claimed to have created everything as a game; yes, it was going to be EGG. Anyway, EGG and the Egg were going to be a weird gestalt being, a psionic combination of both.

I havent used the Egg of Coot, but it exists in my 5e Greyhawk setting to the far north coast of the Flanaess subcontinent. See the map from the 2024 Dungeon Masters Guide.

There, I have the Blackmoor village of Arneson as-is. Today Blackmoor is a still only a small fishing village, despite the entire region having been named after it in earlier history. The capital city of this wider region of Blackmoor relocated elsewhere long since. The famous "ruins" in Blackmoor, are specifically Ringo Hall, an ancient elven city, where powerful elven magical remains are still discovered on occasion. The historical village of Blackmoor is on the coastline of the southwest corner of the peninsula there.

Across the waters from the Blackmoor village, exists the Egg of Coot. For 5e Blackmoor, I translate it as an Aberration from the Farrealm. However, it is an ambient Farrealm influence, rather than an individual Aberration entity. Likewise the ambient Farrealm influence of the Aberrant Sorcerer feels at home there. In-setting, scholars debate whether the institution of the psionic aberrant sorcery originated from this region of Coot.
 

This is to give a sense of exactly where the Egg of Coot is.

Here is a closeup of the far-north region of Arn, from the official 2024 Greyhawk map from the Dungeon Masters Guide, namely the map of the subcontinent Flannaess.

closeup of region of Arn, aka Blackmoor, Greyhawk DMsGuide 2024 - Mike Schley.png


D&D 2024 renames the Region of Blackmoor as the region of "Arn", named after Arneson, one of the inventors of D&D. It is a place to put the setting that Arneson created. (Etymologically, the term arn- means "eagle", an appropriate name for a far north region.) The rename might be for copyright reasons, but honoring Arneson by name is cool.

In the original setting, the village of Blackmoor and the city of Greyhawk are local settings that exist in the same shared Flanaess subcontinent setting. The fact that Blackmoor is the first setting ever, is awesome, and is important to keep alive today. Eventually, both Blackmoor and Greyhawk were plugged into the same shared setting of Arneson and Gygax for the Castle & Crusade Society.


Here is a careful overlay of the original local setting from Arneson, onto the 2024 Flannaess map. Notice the different coastlines, but all the locations of the towns and villages are clear. See the location of the "Egg" of Coot between the labels of Blackmoor and Arn.

Yaarel - Blackmoor 2024 maps overlay.png


I went thru much effort to edit the 2024 map to make its coastlines match the Arneson map exactly. But I ended up deciding there is no need. The official 2024 map from the Dungeon Masters Guide works excellently as-is. In fact, even in the original Arneson canon, most of this is shallow marshland whose coastlines are ambiguous and changing anyway. There are even canonical regions of "Sinking Lands" sinking into the waters. The coastlines are in flux, and some of this geological upheaval can be explained by the subtle Farrealm reality-warping influences of the Egg of Coot region, as well as some canonical timey-wimey effects.

In sum, the differences in coastlines dont matter. The differences have never come up in my campaign, when using the 2024 map as-is. If they ever do turn out to require an explanation, it will be, "because magic", including reality-instability.

Note, in the original Arneson map, the Regent of the Mines is a mountainous area that is significant because it is a main access point to a kind of vast Underdark populated by a culture of dwarven miners. This Underdark has never been officially mapped, and who knows, it might be under the entire region of Arn! Perhaps the Regent of Mines that is now underwater is because this part of the Underdark collapsed. A new Regent of Mines can exist elsewhere as a main access point into the Underdark.

Also note the splotchy black square on the overlaid maps. This is the official location of the "ruins" that are in the region of Arn. When overlaying the Arneson setting onto the old Darlene map, it made sense to identify the ruins as that of Ringo Hall. However, here on the 2024 map the ruins are in a different location closer to Bramwald. The Darlene map is more sketchy and suggestive of a medievalesque map pieced together from disparate sources. The new 2024 map looks more "technomagically" precise, drawn by cartographers employing accurate divination magic. In my earlier campaigns, the ruins are Ringo. But now in my new campaign for the 2024 map, the ruins are "Old Ringo". There is now also a "New Ringo", a different elven city named after it.

The 2024 region of Arn is nice because it is a pervasively magical area, yet it is almost entirely rural. The only urban locales are Dantredun in the distance − and even then "urban" is an exaggeration. Plus: "New Ringo" that I style as an elven magitech city that blends seemlessly within the natural woodland, alongwith the Underdark where various dwarven cities are. But the environs that adventureres normally come across are many people, but across modest farming and fishing villages. Arn is a great setting for an ambient old-school low-magic campaign − with a dash of old-school gonzo.


Here is a map of the original Blackmoor local setting locations, but instead using the official 5e 2024 map of Greyhawk. Notice where the Egg of Coot − and its psionic aberrant sorcery − locate.

Yaarel - Blackmoor 2024.png
 
Last edited:

Remove ads

Top