the player (we played in ebberon) was dragon marked, dragon marked heir, monk AND fighter
wth was he?
Funny enough? A character with a far deeper and mroe interesting tie to the setting then anyone else, most likely.
like, usually, to me atleast, the class has a bit of character to it, a monk is reserved, it makes sense to have them cloisterd, organized, ect. ect.
not this guy, he just took what he wanted to make him better
Yes, the adventurer went down a path to make him a better adventurer. How...terrible?
he was the only person to get out of a dungeon, he left us all there as we died and he ran away, from that time on, I hate monks
So he avoided a TPK. How...terrible?
you never leave youre party behind, even if youre who exsistance is to not help anyone ever, seriously, the character did 1 thing the whole time and that was run ahead of the party and find traps, wouldnt disable them or anything, just set them off...its not like the 2 rogues, the artificer or the scout could have done the same without setting them off and saying "hey monsters! look at me!"
So your problem with the monk is that it's a weak class. Um.
I just...if I played a monk, hed be straight monk (all 20 levels) and actually care about his past, where he came from, ect. ect.
If I played a <character>, he'd be <whatever character it is with whatever mix of levels>, and actually care about his past, where he came from, etc, etc.
And I'd probably be better at it then you, to boot.