WotC Comparing EN World's Demographics to the D&D Community's

WotC released some figures this week. I thought it would be fun to compare them to the demographics of our own little community here on EN World for the same period (2019). WotC uses a metric it refers to as 40,000,000 'D&D Fans', but that's not defined. For the purposes of this, I assume a fan is a person who has interacted directly with D&D in some way (played a game, bought a book, watch a...

WotC released some figures this week. I thought it would be fun to compare them to the demographics of our own little community here on EN World for the same period (2019).

WotC uses a metric it refers to as 40,000,000 'D&D Fans', but that's not defined. For the purposes of this, I assume a fan is a person who has interacted directly with D&D in some way (played a game, bought a book, watch a stream, played a video game, etc.) A fan's a fan, however they interact with D&D!

For comparison, I'm using people who have interacted with EN World in some way -- and what we can measure is unique visitors. Obviously this isn't on the same scale (40M people is a LOT) but it doesn't matter too much for what we're doing here; they're both samples for conversation. So, let's start at the top!
  • Short version: EN World skews younger, but more male than the overall D&D community.
WotC is looking at 40M fans, we're looking at 5.6M unique users (as opposed to overall visits, which numbers in the tens of millions). We get this data using Google Analytics, which provides a lot of anonymized demographic data. I can't identify any individual person with this; it merely shows the overall numbers. Our demographic data includes just under half of those 5.6M users; I don't know how WotC's data is derived. I know they do surveys from time to time, but I don't know what percentage of those 40M fans fill out those forms.

As an aside - 40 million D&D fans is awesome! We're definitely living in a golden age of tabletop gaming, and as the market leader, WotC is the entity most responsible for bringing in new gamers. Well, maybe Critical Role is, but they're playing D&D!

Age

So, the controversial data that everybody on Twitter is talking about -- the age groups. Google Analytics breaks it down a little differently to WotC's figures, so here's what we have. GA doesn't give stats on people under 18 years of age. The figures below are those GA has data on for EN World -- obviously that's only about half of overall users.

Age​
Numbers​
Percentage​
18-24592,401 users24.58%
25-341,309,373 users54.33%
35-44330,755 users13.46%
45-54138,372 users5.74%
55-6426,689 users1.11%
65+12,631 users0.52%

As you can see, the figures aren't as evenly distributed as WotC's. There's a significant number of 25-34 year-olds, and a higher number of 18-24 year-olds. Also, it shows people above the age of 45, who don't appear in WotC's stats.
  • We show a slightly higher percentage of people 34 or under (79% compared to WotC's measure of 74%) although we're not measuring people under 18, which would skew it younger if we were.
  • 26% of WotC's audience is over 25, while only 20% of EN World's is.
  • 7.37% of EN World's audience is over 45.
  • Under 18s are not included in the stats.
  • EN World skews younger than the D&D community overall.
Screen Shot 2020-04-25 at 12.09.27 AM.png

For comparison, here are WotC's figures.

Screen Shot 2020-04-25 at 12.42.49 AM.png


I've turned them into a quick and dirty bar graph. The number of players increases slowly from 8 up until age 35, peaking at ages 30-34, and then it starts to drop off sharply. That's the same age that the drop-off on EN World's readership takes place, too. Seems about 30 is peak age.

wotc_age.jpg


And here are those same figures in absolute numbers -- 10% of 40,000,000 people is a LOT of people!

Age​
Percentage​
Numbers​
8-1212%4.8 million
13-1713%5.2 million
18-2415%6 million
25-2915%6 million
30-3419%7.6 million
35-3915%6 million
40-4511%4.4 million

Gender

The gender demographics here skew much more male than WotC's stats do. Google Analytics shows male and female (it doesn't track non-binary people) and reports on under half of overall users (2.3M out of 5.6M total).

Of those, it reports 85.56% male, 14.44% female. It doesn't provide data on non-binary visitors.

Screen Shot 2020-04-25 at 12.08.51 AM.png



Geography

WotC's report shows that Europe is growing for them. As a European (at least geographically!) that's heartwarming news for me. So here's some figures on EN World's geographical distribution.

As you can see, it skews primarily English-speaking heavily, which is expected for an English-language community.

United States3,376,839 users59.14%
United Kingdom (yay!)478,217 users8.38%
Canada411,179 users7.2%
Australia198,922 users3.48%
Brazil125,682 users2.2%
Germany109,248 users1.91%
Italy95,682 users1.68%
Netherlands74,139 users1.3%
Sweden51,479 users0.9%
Spain47,096 users0.82%

The list goes on for pages, but we're under 1% now.

The average EN World reader is male, American, between 25-34.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Zardnaar

Legend
More females playing but the core age group still seems to be that early 20s.
Met the first female DM last year. She runs short campaigns for new players.

D&D is more classist IMHO. More women but it's still mostly middle and upper classss white people. Poor people don't tend to play.

That's from local observation, two Facebook groups.

My Facebook groups have some of the women I gamed with in the 90s. My group was unusual I suppose but found out some of the guys back then said some things I didn't know about.

Nothing targeted just 16 year old guys being stupid/ listening to gangsta rap (1996).
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Morrus

Well, that was fun
Staff member
I meant: is the engagement on those other platforms similar, in either scale (a fraction of a percent) or kind (a particular demographic)?
I don’t know! You mean engagement with my stuff or D&D in general? And by engagement how do you mean? I don’t have 5.6 million friends on Facebook or followers on Twitter, so my website has a massive advantage over those things for me personally.
 

Fanaelialae

Legend
More females playing but the core age group still seems to be that early 20s.
Met the first female DM last year. She runs short campaigns for new players.

D&D is more classist IMHO. More women but it's still mostly middle and upper classss white people. Poor people don't tend to play.

That's from local observation, two Facebook groups.

My Facebook groups have some of the women I gamed with in the 90s. My group was unusual I suppose but found out some of the guys back then said some things I didn't know about.

Nothing targeted just 16 year old guys being stupid/ listening to gangsta rap (1996).
I don't think that's true. Back in college my main gaming group was a bunch of folks who rented a house together because they couldn't afford to live on their own. Pretty sure they were all below the poverty line for NJ.

I'll grant you, the price of books is undoubtedly a bit daunting for someone on a tight budget, so that is likely a barrier to entry. But I haven't seen "class" to be a significant distinction with regard to whether someone has an interest in TTRPGs in my own experiences.

Similarly, I've gamed with plenty of women who were just as interested in the game as any of the guys, when given half a chance.
 


Zardnaar

Legend
I don't think that's true. Back in college my main gaming group was a bunch of folks who rented a house together because they couldn't afford to live on their own. Pretty sure they were all below the poverty line for NJ.

I'll grant you, the price of books is undoubtedly a bit daunting for someone on a tight budget, so that is likely a barrier to entry. But I haven't seen "class" to be a significant distinction with regard to whether someone has an interest in TTRPGs in my own experiences.

Similarly, I've gamed with plenty of women who were just as interested in the game as any of the guys, when given half a chance.

With students it's not how much they personally have but what do their parents do?

They might be poor but still come from middle class or better lifestyles and expectations.

It's what background they come from.

In my experience ymmv.

Or what suburb they come from.
 

Morrus

Well, that was fun
Staff member
More females playing but the core age group still seems to be that early 20s.
Met the first female DM last year. She runs short campaigns for new players.

D&D is more classist IMHO. More women but it's still mostly middle and upper classss white people. Poor people don't tend to play.

That's from local observation, two Facebook groups.

My Facebook groups have some of the women I gamed with in the 90s. My group was unusual I suppose but found out some of the guys back then said some things I didn't know about.

Nothing targeted just 16 year old guys being stupid/ listening to gangsta rap (1996).
From local observation, I can assure you that nobody in New Zealand plays D&D. And zero Americans play. Unarguable observational proof!

Because anecdotal evidence is not data. ;)

On the other hand we do have data from Google and WotC.
 

Zardnaar

Legend
From local observation, I can assure you that nobody in New Zealand plays D&D. And zero Americans play. Unarguable observational proof!

Because anecdotal evidence is not data. ;)

On the other hand we do have data from Google and WotC.

Very large Facebook and Reddit groups though.

A lot more females playing or interacting.

Forums I just assume everyone's male. Not literally but close enough.
 


Zardnaar

Legend
Have they shared their demographic stats?

Photos.

Won't have exact numbers but younger than me and white.

University rpg group and D&D game nights. Most groups now have females playing out of 20-30 players.

1 person different ethnic group.

Start an ENworld poll. "What did your parents do when you started D&D".

I didn't have the best start but it's not a common thing I've noticed over the years.

Even in Auckland same thing.
 

Morrus

Well, that was fun
Staff member

Eh? We’re discussing massive quantities of aggregated data forming a demographic cross-section of millions of people here, not some photos you saw on Reddit. Bring data to the table, not anecdotes! :)

I’m sure Facebook and Reddit could provide some very useful data, but that ain’t it.
 

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top