My point was Godzilla's skin is from 3' to 16' thick. Most swords will not even get through its skin. So even if the fighter had a magic sword the could get slice the skin, it can't cut deep enough to hit anything the is vital or even make it bleed. That is my point, not the relative "power" of D&D foes, it was just a discussion of scale.
Sure, but this is why while there is a lot of realism in D&D, it doesn't attempt to mirror reality.
No, what I was saying is that just because they've never playtested material that early doesn't mean that they couldn't be trying to get a headstart. I still think they'd never playtest 12 subclasses for a setting book.
Agreed, that is also why I keep my gojis out of my D&DSure, but this is why while there is a lot of realism in D&D, it doesn't attempt to mirror reality.
You think that a fey subclass isn't related to Planescape? You think that a Wildfire druid isn't related to planescape? Those are the most obvious ones ever! The Phantom Rogue references the Shadowfell and Shadar-Kai. True naming has always been connected to demons and devils. If those aren't planescape in theme, I'll eat my shoe.
You can't. I'm pretty sure that shoes aren't related to Planescape.
They have horn attacks, IIRC
I don't know planescape, but I find your logic a bit odd. If true naming has always been connected to demons and devils, that would imply it is not solely connected to planescape? In fact, the concept in D&D predates planescape by quite a bit.
Demons and Devils are a key part of planescape.
Tanar'ri and Baatezu were a key part of Planescape. Demons and Devils predate it. All of those things are are describing could just as easily be for a Planar Handbook of some sort and not Planescape.
