If it is not fun for you if I have an optional/homebrew rule at my table that has entirely no effect on your game, it is entirely your problem and your fault if your enjoyment/fun is reduced by that. My enjoyment does not reduce yours.
Then adopt it as a houserule. Published material should have some standards.
Mine did and yours was a reply to it.
You know that a lot of tables don't allow homebrew, right? It is way better for something to be an optional rule that is official than a homebrew rule.
Optional rule proposal - fighter 1 hit kills everything with a great sword.
It is not if it is a bad rule like this. And of course WotC cannot start to publish endless amount of optional houserules without any quality control to satisfy every person's preferences.
I stand corrected on that front. However, my point still stands. If my loss of fun equals you having fun, that's a you problem, not a me problem and not an optional rule problem.
Exactly.
But like I've said before, whether or not it is bad is entirely subjective. And, I never said that they should publish endless amounts of optional rules, as that would be ridiculous and is warping the argument. However, it would not have ruined the game or the book if this one rule was printed, which a large number of people do like. The book had room.
Equating a "Swap out one spell on a long rest" rule with "power word greatsword" is a bad faith argument.
