So, Wandavision?

Also, upsetting a super-person so you can harvest their wingdings when they super-freak out ought to be a crime. That's incitement.

Absolutely. Not to mention, the exact opposite of what his mandate was as SWORD's director. Aren't they supposed to protect people from the threat of "sentient weapons", not create new SWs and antagonise extant SWs? How did this guy even get the job?
 

log in or register to remove this ad

and if he wasn't a person, he was the property of Wanda and/or Tony Stark, and Heyward was stealing her property by holding it and vandalizing it by dismantling it. Either way, Crimey Heyward's going to jail.

So, this is a line of thinking I know they won't be using, but it might be entertaining.

The Jarvis AI (which is Stark technology), and the Mind Stone are used to produce the Ultron AI, by Stark and Banner. Stark's legal claim on the Mind Stone is... highly questionable. It is a natural resource, but recovered from Loki when he used it as a weapon. Loki and the Mind Stone were in custody of SHIELD - a government agency. But that was custody as evidence, and does not indicate ownership. Let us leave ownership of the Mind Stone and its internal logic out of the discussion for the moment...

And now we hit an interesting hitch. Was Ultron a person? If not, then Stark Industries is on the hook for all the damage Ultron does, as their technology run amok. That includes illegal acquisition of Vibranium, the death toll and property damage in Sokovia, goodness knows how many acts of cybercrime, etc. Stark Industries was big and wealthy, but not that wealthy. This should have destroyed Stark.

But, it didn't. So either Ultron's origins were hidden from the world, and the whole thing covered up, or a legal out was found. Calling Ultron a person makes his actions purely his (I think they use the masculine pronoun in the movie) own, and gets stark largely off the hook.

If Ultron was a person, then Vision, as Ultron's progeny, was also a person. Then Heyward was defiling a corpse, which is generally illegal.

If Ultron's origins were hidden from the world (which may not have been all that difficult, as so few people actually knew those origins), then it is very difficult for Stark to make a claim to legal ownership of Vision.

Vision's body was created from stolen Vibranium, the U-GIN regeneration chamber, and arguably Thor, who all then have potential claims on Vision's body. The head of U-GIN died,however, so it may be they do not know what happened. When all was said and done, Thor was probably not in any state of mind to exert his claim (which is kinda weak, but... he is a god, who would be able to stop him). Wakanda, for whatever reason, did not take custody (possibly, nobody there actually thought about it).

But, lastly, Vision worked with the Avengers, which was a government funded project. I suspect that once he is dead and unable to argue otherwise, it is easy to make the legal argument that Vision was an Avenger's Project asset, which was then transferred to SWORD. This would mean that Heyward's work with the body wasn't exactly illegal (on basis of ownership) though it may have been unseemly or unsanctioned.

Heyward's arrest, then, is probably more about his tactics - his evidence tampering, questionably holding a federal officer and civilian (Woo and Darcy), use of force within a civilian population, and so on.
 

Absolutely. Not to mention, the exact opposite of what his mandate was as SWORD's director. Aren't they supposed to protect people from the threat of "sentient weapons", not create new SWs and antagonise extant SWs? How did this guy even get the job?
He was apparently traumatized by the snap and the aftermath as one of the 50% left behind. He was clearly somewhat deranged by it.
 
Last edited:

I wonder if they are going back to the Chthon possessing Wanda storyline from Avengers back in 1979. The Wanda perusing the Darkhold in the post-credits scene had a bit of this look about her:

View attachment 133896

And that storyline involved the Darkhold. :unsure:
I mostly hope not, if only because I - and I dare say we - don't need another "female character can't handle her powers" story.
I think, in the state she's in at the start of the series, she very literally doesn't think about it. Or if she does, she denies, rationalizes, shoves away (sometimes very forcefully) or conveniently forgets things that contradict the safety of the cocoon she's built around herself. For a time, she loses grip on reality.

No, this is not the action of a healthy mind. That's what we've been trying to tell you. Her psyche is pretty broken.
This keeps reminding me of Elsa in Frozen, wherein she creates a climate crisis and either doesn't know it or doesn't care, and as such seems on her way to becoming a super-villain, if not already there.
 


Early on, Hayward himself mentions Vision's "living will". Now, my understanding of the law is that only persons can have a will. It seems to mean that Hayward himself, at least in public, acknowledges Vision to have been a person and not a machine or property.

That also means that, by reanimating his corpse, he is guilty of necromancy.
 

He was apparently traumatized by the snap and the aftermath as one of the 50% left behind. He was clearly somewhat deranged by it.
Ah yes. That makes sense. I wish they'd delved a little deeper into that, because he was a pretty one-note cliche villain, but it sounds like his motivation was worked out and mentioned, just not portrayed very satisfyingly.
 

Ah yes. That makes sense. I wish they'd delved a little deeper into that, because he was a pretty one-note cliche villain, but it sounds like his motivation was worked out and mentioned, just not portrayed very satisfyingly.
I hope it foreshadows a bit more clash between people who experienced the 5 year post snap vs those who didn't. It could be fuel for some interactions in Falcon and Winter Soldier since both of them were snapped out.
 

A thing they don't talk about - Vision was not a human being, so there's a huge question about his legal status.
I would assume in a universe where aliens and sentient robots and Thors and gods and stuff were common, there would be some sort of legislation regarding their legal status. Maybe the Sokovia Accords cover it.
 


Remove ads

Top