...you are. You are among those who said that if they stop printing monsters with alignment labels, that would be horrible. I can go dig up the quotes if you really need me to. But you really did say, in this thread and the previous ("RIP alignment"), that monsters printed without alignment would be a terrible awful thing.
Literally all I'm advocating for is that. Not printing monsters with alignment anymore. I don't care if specific settings still use it (just as I don't care if specific settings say that certain kinds of classes do or don't exist, e.g. Dark Sun and the Divine power source). I don't care if specific tables still elect to use it. I don't even care if it's still explicitly laid out in an "optional rules" section in the DMG and/or PHB. Presumably the DMG part would cover deities, outsiders, and various creature groups, organizations, and--if necessary--cultures, while the PHB would present alignment as an optional system for adding specificity to one's character. All that is totally fine, and works perfectly well for an opt-in system provided by the rules but not required by it.
You have repeatedly argued to me that it is necessary for alignment to remain an inherent default. That means all creatures must either be classified under it, or explicitly opted out of it (e.g. "Unaligned").
Since I apparently haven't communicated this with all the other stuff, let me do so in the most succinct and direct manner possible:
YES.
As demonstrated by actual player behavior, actual DM behavior, continuing discussion on AND off forums, actual play experience from myself and numerous people whose judgment I trust, and repeated muddling and confusion from the writers themselves, yes. It really is that hard. I don't know why. It shouldn't be. It should be trivially easy. But it isn't. I've tried to give you demonstrations of and hypothesized justifications for this inherently unreasonable thing. None of them have stuck, and at this point, I feel I've done my due diligence.