TSR Companies & Freelancers Distance Themselves From The New TSR

The new TSR (which I refer to as TSR3 to avoid confusion) has doubled down on its stance--which has been widely condemned online--via an ongoing series of tweets and replies from its TSR Games, Giantlands, and Dungeon Hobby Museum social media accounts (possibly operated by Justin LaNasa) in an astonishing PR campaign which makes the original interview which sparked off the controversy look mild in comparison. Various entities are moving to distance themselves from the company and its activities, including TSR2, the company founded in 2011 by Jayson Elliot, which has now declared that it will not be using the name TSR any longer. Other companies including Gen Con and freelancers such as Jeff Dee have also made statements.

For reference -- TSR1 is the (no longer existing) company which launched D&D in 1974, TSR2 is the company founded by Jayson Elliot in 2011 to create Gygax Magazine and which currently publishes the Top Secret RPG, and TSR3 is the newly launched company.



Catch up on my previous coverage of this story:


TSR3's social media accounts initially sought to distance the company from Ernie Gygax's statements, but within a few hours had reversed course and doubled down on his stance. Note that there have been dozens of social media posts from the company over the last few days, and still continuing as I type this, and I don't intend to share them all here.

(Thanks to Daniel Fox for sharing screenshots below via Twitter).

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 10.19.46 PM.png

tsr_distance.jpeg

tsr3_gyg.jpeg


Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 10.00.40 PM.png

tsr3dis.jpeg

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 11.44.54 PM.png

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 11.45.42 PM.png

uROPf5GL_400x400.jpg

TSR2 -- "Update to our earlier tweet - we will NOT be licensing anything from the new company claiming rights to the TSR logos. We are not working with them in any fashion."

Gen Con -- "Gen Con is not associated with TSR Games and we don't support their recent statements. While the foundation of Gen Con is tied with the history of TTRPGs, our goal is to build off the good, acknowledge the bad, and work toward a present free from racism, misogyny, and homophobia."

Gen Con has also indicated that they do not intend to allow TSR3 at the convention.

gencon.jpeg

GAMA (the Game Manufacturers Association) -- "We’re aware of the appalling statements published by TSR Games and their founder - GAMA does not condone nor agree with any part of it. We pride ourselves on supporting and promoting inclusivity always. Our motto is “A game at every table, a table for everyone”. Transphobia, racism, and sexism will not be tolerated. That means that TSR is not welcome at Origins Game Fair, GAMA Expo or any event affiliated with our organization."

Jeff Dee -- "There is a rumor going around that I am part of this new TSR company. That is not accurate. I have done some work for them as a freelance artist. That’s how I make my living, and spreading the misinformation that I’m now employed full-time by one particular client could stop other clients from approaching me and hurt my business. So, please do not spread that rumor. If I ever become a full-time employee anywhere again, I will announce that myself. Thanks. UPDATE: After investigating reports about statements made by representatives of this new TSR, I have determined that I can no longer do business with them in good conscience. I've returned their downpayment on the next piece of art I was scheduled to do for them. And yeah, I could sure use some new commissions to make up for this big hit on my cashflow"

Jim Ward, an original TSR alumnus and who wrote Giantlands, TSR3's flagship product -- "At the present time I know little or nothing about the relaunch of TSR. Right now I don't see how anyone could pick up where the old company left off. Yes it's a name with some logos, that is all I know."

Luke Gygax -- "FYI- I am not involved with any TSR company nor is Gary Con nor anyone else in my family outside of Ernie. Full stop. That is all ... I have reasons for distancing myself. The way TSR treats people online in their public exchanges is rude. The museum is a for profit business and was asking for donations. Using names of people to promote without their knowledge. Going out of the way to talk gender/woke stuff ... Also basically jacking the TSR logo from Jayson Elliot. The bombastic press releases and claims to old IP. Making a quick nostalgia money grab based on my fathers name and not much else. So I’m making it clear I don’t like this style and I have ZERO to do with TSR"

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 10.16.53 PM.png

TSR3 responds to Luke Gygax

Tim Kask, an original TSR alumnus who worked at the company until 1980, spoke at length on this topic in a YouTube video (below). I've transcribed some bits, but he says a whole load more (ellipses represent sections I have not included, for reasons of brevity), so check out the video for the whole thing.

"There has been bandied about in social media over the last several days several claims about what's going on in Lake Geneva right now. Ernie Gygax made a most egregious mistake in an interview he did on a podcast. He basically waved his bare ass in front of everybody that's concerned about pronouns, and woke, and all that right now in the industry and thumbed his nose at them. The transcript of his podcasts are there for everyone to read. That they were men, and they didn't give a sh*t, and la la la.

But right there they alienated three quarters of the gaming industry. Probably more than that, I don't believe that there's a quarter of the gaming industry that still are the neanderthals that he would make us out to be.

That's another thing. This whole thing has brought the OSR (the old school revival) into serious disrepute. Now there are some little Karens going on some of the social media and painting with the same brush all of us that were there back then based on the stupid ass sh*t that Ernie just said. No. We weren't all like that. And we aren't all like that now. He's a troll, a troglodyte, a neanderthal, if he really means that. It's a foolish person that doesn't wet his finger once in a while and feel the wind shift.

Now there've been claims in a couple of posts, one of which is by Ernie, about how the stalwarts, the old TSR are flocking to the banner. Bullsh*t....

... There is no one of the creative side of TSR from the early days involved with the Dungeon Hobby Shop Museum. No one. Not one creative person. No matter who might be claiming what, they simply do not have the credentials. Being named DiMaggio does not mean you can hit a lot of home runs. Or that you even hit any home runs ....

... Just because you say you're TSR doesn't mean you are."


 

log in or register to remove this ad

Why would WotC be forced to respond to this? It's some old guy shouting at clouds, and making legal threats will just bring more attention to it and make WotC look like they have something to hide. My prediction is still that WotC will respond if/when TSR3 actually messes with IP that they care about (like actually sending a cease and desist letter to someone who's using art WotC actually has the copyright to), and that they'll narrowly focus on defending their specific IP rights, not on any broad unprovable issue or on trying to mess with a trademark for a company that's been defunct for decades.

Proving libel is tough, and while I'm not an expert, I'm pretty sure WotC qualifies as a public figure for the purpose of libel laws, which means anything Ernie says could only qualify as libel if he "knew either that the information was wholly and patently false or that [he] published [it] 'with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not'" (From wikipedia). That is, if WotC wanted to make a claim of libel, it wouldn't be enough to prove that there was nothing that qualified as a 'coordinated assault', they would have to prove that Ernie knew the 'coordinated assault' was just made up - and I am pretty sure that Ernie believes what he's saying. To me, that looks like a quagmire that WotC can't possibly prevail in that would bring Ernie's claims to orders of magnitude more people than have seen them so far.
They are trying to force WotC to respond, of course. Their whole antagonistic, controversial approach reeks of this tactic. They want national exposure. They will continue this as WotC has not responded, so sooner or later WotC will have to respond, that's all I'm saying. A pest can nip at a giant's heels for so long before the giant finally squashes it. WotC should not respond, correct, But at some time, as they keep repeating this lie and seeking the attention they are not getting that they want, WotC will be forced to respond, that's all I'm inferring.

On another note this appears to be their strategy--it's a sucker's strategy, using both sides against the middle and exposes the underbelly of the NuTSR beast. Real damage is being done on many fronts with this as recorded here and elsewhere.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

"The past is a foreign country; they do things differently there." - The Go-Between (1953) by L.P. Hartley.

I am positive you know what a metaphor is. I won't bore you overly much with history theory, but many modern historians sometimes use the above quote when talking about what history is and what it isn't. The past is not a lived experience, rather it is made up of our memories and our interpretations.

I don't think it's a matter of not caring I just don't think they viewed it as sexual assault. Which I will grant you sounds incredulous to most modern ears.
Marital Rape wasn't made illegal in all 50 states until 1993. Revenge of the Nerds and Sixteen Candles were both made in 1984.

Just one year before, Deathstalker was made. A movie where sexual assault and outright rape are essentially used as a greeting between men and women. The -hero- of the movie sexually assaults multiple women and tries to rape a guy who has been magically transformed into a woman because he didn't realize there was a dude under the boobs. It's played off for comedy.

Women knew what it was. It just wasn't -legally- or socially called rape or sexual assault 'til later. And any comments about it were largely ignored or shouted down by guys who didn't want to acknowledge that they had probably committed a sexual assault thinking it was totally normal relations.

Heck. We still have dudes doing HORRIBLY RAPEY and misogynistic stuff in movies that get greenlit even though it's freaking obvious. Chris Pratt was recently in a movie where he woke up on a spaceship that would be sailing for the rest of his life and knew he was going to be alone, but he liked the look of a girl in a pod on the shelf so woke her up to condemn her to never see her friends or family again so he could have a friend and potential romance partner.

How -creepy- is that? How abjectly -terrible- is that as a concept? "I'm going to doom you to a long and dull life on a starship with no company but me 'cause I thought you looked hot and you're gonna be my wife, eventually!" And then she -does- fall in love with him because... Hollywood, I guess?

Women knew it was rape when Lewis Skolnick pretended to be Betty's beau so he could bang her. Men just didn't care.
 


So, here's a point, though... whatever "public opinion" may have been (and, this is highly debatable, as womens' voices were likely largely left out of criticism of the piece back in the day) The fact of the matter is that sexual assault was traumatic then too, and people knew it - they just didn't care. Arguments that it was somehow "less wrong" back then are bogus.
Animal House has a subplot about a girl they learn is young (edit: she's supposed to be 13 years old) at the fraternity house and she gets so drunk, she has to be wheeled around in a shopping cart. One of the pledges wrestles with whether to have sex with her (rape her -- she's both below the age of consent and incapable of making an informed decision even if she was of-age), which is played for laughs. She later on introduces the pledge to her father (the mayor) as "the boy who molested me."

That's a movie that's held in much higher repute than Revenge of the Nerds and it's a pretty awful scene.
 
Last edited:



Here's a review of Revenge of the Nerds from 1984 when it was still in theaters.
It is the absence of genuine comedy that exposes glaringly the film's fundamental attitude of condescension and scorn toward blacks and women, and a tendency toward stereotyping that clashes violently with its superficial message of tolerance, compassion and fair play.
Even back then, Lawrence Van Gelder (A dude born in 1933) knew it. Though he didn't express it as such.

The Cameras hidden for stealing nudes, the rape sequence, Betty giving up her relationship because Lewis is a cunning linguist...

Scorn.
 


"The past is a foreign country; they do things differently there." - The Go-Between (1953) by L.P. Hartley.

I am positive you know what a metaphor is. I won't bore you overly much with history theory, but many modern historians sometimes use the above quote when talking about what history is and what it isn't. The past is not a lived experience, rather it is made up of our memories and our interpretations.

I don't think it's a matter of not caring I just don't think they viewed it as sexual assault. Which I will grant you sounds incredulous to most modern ears.
Yes, I'm familiar with both the quote and the fact that it's a metaphor; I'm disagreeing with its accuracy. That it's pithy or a quotation doesn't make it correct.

You keep talking about the 1980s and 'they' and 'modern ears' as though it was a misty Beforetime that we can only recall through historical research and that nobody alive today remembers, and, uh, that's not the case.
 


You keep talking about the 1980s and 'they' and 'modern ears' as though it was a misty Beforetime that we can only recall through historical research and that nobody alive today remembers, and, uh, that's not the case.
A few of my professors disabused me of the habit of saying "we" or "us" in regards to US history. "You say 'we' were upset about unfair taxes. Were you there?" Although, yes, in this case at least, I was there, it's a hard habit to break.
 

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top