Azzy
ᚳᚣᚾᛖᚹᚢᛚᚠ (He/Him)
Hey, as long as you keep your nuts out of my chocolate we're good.Regular M&Ms are the sad lie provided to gullible children who have never experienced the joy of real candy.
...like NECCO WAFERS.
Hey, as long as you keep your nuts out of my chocolate we're good.Regular M&Ms are the sad lie provided to gullible children who have never experienced the joy of real candy.
...like NECCO WAFERS.
Given that I'm deathly allergic to Peanuts (and practically all Tree-Nuts, as well as Coconut), no, we cannot all agree that Peanut M&Ms are the only edible type of M&Ms.Can we at least all agree that the pure chocolate M&Ms are terrible and the only edible sort are the M&Ms with peanuts?
Can't we just keep discussing M&M's? How many flavors do you guys have in the US?Anyways, what was the topic of this thread, again? Oh, yeah, racism in old D&D products. Very weird tangent.
Peanut M&Ms have been my M&M of choice since 1976. I especially like frozen chocolate, so I put a bag in the freezer and eat them that way.
There's a very strong streak of egalitarianism and freedom that's very American built right into the bones of D&D. In "good" societies, people are free to worship who and how they see fit, people of all backgrounds (elves, halflings, humans, dwarves, etc., etc.) are free to participate in society as equals, and player characters are in charge of their own destinies and are not beholden to lords or other authority figures. Oh, and they're typically interested in making money had over fist! American society is very individualistic and I think that shows in D&D.It seems to me that the question of whether or not Dnd was inspired by westerns is irrelevant. The question is whether it reflects particularly American ideals of heroism, which also happen to be exemplified by westerns.
Honestly, I think they were just used as inspiration for their game. It's rare that I find an RPG good at emulating the source material that inspired it. Though I re-read a Conan story by R. Howard in 2019, and I was intrigued by just how much the titular barbarian behaved like a D&D character. He gets to a room and immediately starts searching for secret doors in a scene reminiscent of many, many gaming sessions from my youth.Considering how badly D&D does any of those types of stories, perhaps you think that Gygax and Arneson failed to understand the source material?
The point about Arthur has already been made.The Silmarillion is full of men who by their own hand gained fame and power. Arthur became king because Knights(lower nobility) in Europe have been made due to the acts of heroism of commoners.
I did once hear someone argue that superheroes are fascist for those reasons you list.What is most striking for me is the role of vigilante violence in D&D. D&D characters don't inflict violence in the name of a cause, or based on some claim to authority or justified retribution, but because they can, and they take themselves to be entitled to impose their own values and desires onto the world. To me that is reminiscent of westerns, and also super-hero comics (another quintessentially American genre?). It also resonates strongly, and unsurprisingly, with REH's Conan.