D&D General "Red Orc" American Indians and "Yellow Orc" Mongolians in D&D


log in or register to remove this ad



Question: Would Goodberry sustain a Mind Flayer? Would the Mind Flayer's need to consume brains override the spell's description of sustaining the creature that consumes it, or would the spell's descriptive text override the Mind Flayer's need to consume brains?

Because if it's the latter option, that gives Mind Flayers a fairly easy way out of the whole "evil by existing" dilemma, because they would no longer have to eat brains, and instead just become/find a Druid that could cast Goodberry regularly to sustain them.

(In my world, a group of cast-off Mind Flayers have discovered how to grow synthetic brains so they don't have to eat the minds of innocent people.)
 



The cows are actually really self-sacrificing, chickens self-loathing.

And the pigs are secretly history's greatest monsters, so killing them is Lawful Good and not eating them is wasting prescious bacon.

I know about the cows from the Restaurant at the End of the Universe,
and a friend was traumatized by chickens when young...
and nothing changes the beginning of the Wizard of Oz quite like knowing that pigs occasionally eat their farmers.
 


Or like the Illithids say: "we think you can draw a pretty legitimate line of distinction between things that have a telepathic hive-mind and things that don't."

Yeah, but I don't care much what the illithids think. I don't think you have to believe in cosmic evil to use it for a term. If pigs actually find a way to communicate with me tomorrow, I'd be off pork the next day, and that's exactly the situation the mind flayers are in.
 


Remove ads

Top