• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

D&D 5E Arguing, ideating and solution-seeking on the D&D Enworld forum

Overall, which of the following best describes Enworld's D&D forum discussions? (choose THREE)

  • A1. Too much arguing

  • A2. Just the right amount of arguing

  • A3. Not enough arguing

  • B1. Too much ideation/brainstorming

  • B2. Just the right amount of ideation/brainstorming

  • B3. Not enough ideation/brainstorming

  • C1: Too many creative solutions

  • C2: Just the right amount of creative solutions

  • C3: Not enough creative solutions


Results are only viewable after voting.

log in or register to remove this ad


Umbran

Mod Squad
Staff member
Supporter
Or at least some general consensus it is, even one of us as an individual does not agree.

This feels like a bit of an edge case, though. How often do we actually have to come to an agreement or consensus?

Maybe more tellingly, given the amount of argument we have - how often does argument generate consensus? Is argument really a good way to bring folks into general consensus? Or wouldn't some other approach be more persuasive?
 



DarkMantle

Explorer
From the Orcs and Drow poll, is anybody else getting the impression that all of the arguing has not moved the needle at all whatsoever? Or am I misreading the whole issue?
 


Oofta

Legend
From the Orcs and Drow poll, is anybody else getting the impression that all of the arguing has not moved the needle at all whatsoever? Or am I misreading the whole issue?
Some people don't think the needle needs to be moved, some think that if you don't move the needle that it means you are morally bankrupt, others ask "what needle". 🤷‍♂️
 

DarkMantle

Explorer
Some people don't think the needle needs to be moved, some think that if you don't move the needle that it means you are morally bankrupt, others ask "what needle". 🤷‍♂️
Ya so between all those different positions, I was thinking along the lines of inefficiency, or cost-benefit analysis. The cost seems high (all that arguing, time and energy). The benefits seems negligible.
 
Last edited:

From the Orcs and Drow poll, is anybody else getting the impression that all of the arguing has not moved the needle at all whatsoever? Or am I misreading the whole issue?
There were a lot of people who didn't know what the issue was, and learned via forum posts. Maybe here, maybe elsewhere.

There are probably a couple people who actually changed their mind. Not more than several, I would guess, but not likely zero either.

And there were a few people who were really vocal about telling everyone else racism isn't a thing, and they have largely been ostracized, which I would say is to the benefit of the community.
 

Voidrunner's Codex

Remove ads

Top