D&D 5E (2014) Spelljammer Errata

[dave2008]

An errata for SpellJammer: Adventures in Space is now available: Errata

It includes changes to:

Adventurer's Guide

• Astral Elf
• Hadozee Story
• Glide

Boo's Menagerie

• Statblocks by Challenge Rating table
• Astral Elf Star Priest
• Autognome
• Efy Monger
• Psurlon Ringer
• Ancient Solar Dragon
• Young Solar Dragon

Lights of Xaryxis

• pg 28

 

[JEB]

Good on them getting it out right behind the D&D Beyond update.

 

[dave2008]

Good on them getting it out right behind the D&D Beyond update.

I imagine vetting the statement is what caused the delay between the Beyond update and the release of the PDF

 

[MonsterEnvy]

They have also issued an apology about the Hadozee

Dungeons & Dragons | The Official Home of D&D

Get the latest D&D news, purchase official books, and use the D&D Beyond toolset to create characters and run adventures with ease.

dnd.wizards.com

 

[Uni-the-Unicorn!]

So all those complaints in the other tread amounted to waiting a few hours for the pdf to be released? Have some patience people.

 

[JEB]

The campaign includes a people called Hadozee which first appeared in 1982.

And yet everything folks objected to in the 5E version was new to the 5E version. Can't blame older editions for this one, Wizards.

 

[MonsterEnvy]

And yet everything folks objected to in the 5E version was new to the 5E version. Can't blame older editions for this one, Wizards.

No some objections were about material that was in the older version, that some people thought were part of the current one.

 

[Uni-the-Unicorn!]

And yet everything folks objected to in the 5E version was new to the 5E version. Can't blame older editions for this one, Wizards.

That is not true. People were digging up stuff from a wiki page with old lore. It was not just the the 5e stuff.

And the WotC statement is talking about them making a mistake now, they are not trying to blame an old edition.

 

[doctorbadwolf]

And yet everything folks objected to in the 5E version was new to the 5E version.

False.

Can't blame older editions for this one, Wizards.

They didn’t try to.

 

[JEB]

No some objections were about material that was in the older version, that some people thought were part of the current one.

As I said, everything folks objected to in the 5E version was new to the 5E version. And they're apologizing for "our most recent release."

And the WotC statement is talking about them making a mistake now, they are not trying to hide behind an old edition.

Then why is the original creation date of the Hadozee even mentioned?